2023
DOI: 10.55593/ej.26104a10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CLIL realities through the lens of English and content teachers

Abstract: This research investigated six established areas for quality (Ortega-Martín et al., 2018) in the implementation of CLIL programmes in a Spanish monolingual autonomous community from the perspective of its teachers, in particular focusing on possible differences of opinion between content and English language teachers, an understudied area. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 36 teachers at four secondary schools in urban Extremadura so as to assess the perceptions of the execution and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, efforts must be made to establish a supportive and effective environment for language teaching and learning. One of the efforts is varying interaction strategies using the target language in the language instructional process (Fielden & Agudo, 2023). Due to their significance as indicators of language teaching quality, the interaction strategies in this study include the distribution of the talking time (Noboa & López, 2020;Haliti, 2018;Kostadinovska-Stojchevska & Popovikj, 2019), interaction patterns (An et al, 2021;Kuyyogsuy, 2019;Thi & Thuy, 2021), the performance of illocutionary acts (Azizah, 2019;Faturrochman et al, 2021;Suryandani & Budasi, 2021), and the use of native language (Roslina, 2021;Sundari & Febriyanti, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, efforts must be made to establish a supportive and effective environment for language teaching and learning. One of the efforts is varying interaction strategies using the target language in the language instructional process (Fielden & Agudo, 2023). Due to their significance as indicators of language teaching quality, the interaction strategies in this study include the distribution of the talking time (Noboa & López, 2020;Haliti, 2018;Kostadinovska-Stojchevska & Popovikj, 2019), interaction patterns (An et al, 2021;Kuyyogsuy, 2019;Thi & Thuy, 2021), the performance of illocutionary acts (Azizah, 2019;Faturrochman et al, 2021;Suryandani & Budasi, 2021), and the use of native language (Roslina, 2021;Sundari & Febriyanti, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%