2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1523-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change affects the outcome of competitive interactions?an application of principal response curves

Abstract: It has been hypothesised that climate change may affect vegetation by changing the outcome of competitive interactions. We use a space-for-time approach to evaluate this hypothesis in the context of alpine time-of-snowmelt gradients. Principal response curves, a multivariate repeated-measurement analysis technique, are used to analyse for compositional differences in local ridge-to-snowbed gradients among 100 m altitudinal bands from 1,140 to 1,550 m a.s.l., corresponding to a temperature gradient of 2.5 degre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of snowbed vegetation reflects a shift from a sparse vegetation cover to denser vegetation characterized by species found in the surrounding vegetation (Heegard 2002;Heegaard and Vandvik 2004;Björk and Molau 2007). It is suggested that snowbed plants are restricted by growing season length and the availability of phosphorus (Björk and Molau 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of snowbed vegetation reflects a shift from a sparse vegetation cover to denser vegetation characterized by species found in the surrounding vegetation (Heegard 2002;Heegaard and Vandvik 2004;Björk and Molau 2007). It is suggested that snowbed plants are restricted by growing season length and the availability of phosphorus (Björk and Molau 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotic interactions under a variety of observational, experimental and theoretical settings have been found to play a significant role determining how species' distributions are structured and how they will be likely to respond to climate change (Davis et al 1998;Anderson et al 2002;Heegaard & Vandvik 2004;Araújo & Luoto 2007;Brooker et al 2007;Heikkinen et al 2007). A third factor would include spatial variation in the response of species and communities to changing climates (Visser et al 2003;Genner et al 2004), which could result in outcomes that, when summarized geographically, could differ from historic associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are however few alternatives for dealing with multiple species responses in multivariate autoregressive models (but see Jin et al [2005]; M13 in Table 1). Alternatively, restricted permutations may also help by considering the appropriate number of ''exchangeable units'' (and consequently degrees of freedom) in multi-way sampling designs, particularly when sites are embedded within ecological classes (Anderson andter Braak 2003, Couteron andPe´lissier 2004, Heegaard and August 2012 261 SPATIAL MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS Vandvik 2004). Another approach is to filter out (remove) the effects of spatial dependence by detrending (''spatial filtering'' sensu Griffith [2000]; M7 in Table 1).…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%