2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021ef002055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change and Changes in Compound Coastal‐Riverine Flooding Hazard Along the U.S. Coasts

Abstract: Coastal cities are exposed to multiple flood drivers such as extreme coastal high tide, storm surge, extreme precipitation, and high river flow. The interaction among these flood drivers may cause a compound flood event (Moftakhari et al., 2017; that could exacerbate flood impacts and cause huge social and economic losses (Hemmati et al., 2020;Zscheischler et al., 2018). In regions where the flood level is influenced by both extreme sea levels (SLs; either from tide or storm surge) and river flows, considering… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, we find that the statistical dependence between extreme rainfall and storm tide increases in the future for large swaths of the coastline, resulting in a higher probability to observe multi-hazard extremes during future storm events. This finding is significant since many previous studies of future compound flooding have neglected potential increases in hazard dependence 9,11,12,32 , which could underestimate compound flood risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, we find that the statistical dependence between extreme rainfall and storm tide increases in the future for large swaths of the coastline, resulting in a higher probability to observe multi-hazard extremes during future storm events. This finding is significant since many previous studies of future compound flooding have neglected potential increases in hazard dependence 9,11,12,32 , which could underestimate compound flood risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent projections of future storm climatology change suggest an increase in the probability of joint rainfall-surge events along much of the European coastline, mostly driven by an increase in rainfall hazard 10 . Along the US coastline, previous studies have considered changes in joint hazard resulting from changes in a subset of climate-induced variables, such as SLR 11 and changes in river flow 12 or changes in rainfall 9 . However, it is still unclear how future changes in TC climatology and SLR will alter the severity and spatial variation of joint rainfall-surge hazard across the US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, what will be the relative contribution of storm climatology change and SLR to changes in the joint hazard, and how changes in TC characteristics are related to changes in rainfall hazard, storm surge hazard, and their dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between climate and natural wildfires are known as the most important drivers of national forest ecosystem responses to future climate change. The increase in forest fires is associated with warmer temperatures and decreasing summer precipitation [1,3,7,[21][22][23][24], both of which are projected to continue under plausible future climate scenarios throughout the 21st century [8,[25][26][27][28]. An improved understanding of linkages between climate variables and natural wildfires is required to forecast future fire activity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative stormwater management techniques such as low impact development (LID), and green infrastructure (GI) can reduce these negative impacts in high density development areas (Seo et al, 2017b;Zhang et al, 2017). However, it should be highlighted that LID/GI practices may not be of much assistance in reducing peak runoff for extreme precipitation events (Ahiablame et al, 2013;Seo et al, 2017a;Zhu et al, 2019) that are likely to increase in the future (Ghanbari et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%