Climate change frames and frame formation : An analysis of climate change communication in the Swedish agricultural sector

Asplund, Therese

doi:10.3384/diss.diva-105997

Cited by 19 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 144 publications

(252 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Entman's (1993) description of frames as being "manifested by the presence or absence of certain keywords, stock phrases, stereotyped images, sources of information, and sentences" (p. 52) may serve to operationalize analysis of climate information credibility. Other framing devices or communicative resources include analogies, distinctions, metaphors, and prototypical examples (Asplund 2014;Marková et al 2007). By letting us experience one thing in relation to another, such communicative resources are said to structure how we perceive, think, and act (c.f Lakoff and Johnson 1980) and highlighting such framing devices enables an analysis of participant formation and construction of perceptions of climate information credibility (Asplund 2014;cf Pan and Kosicki 1993).…”

Section: Conceptualising Credibiltymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other framing devices or communicative resources include analogies, distinctions, metaphors, and prototypical examples (Asplund 2014;Marková et al 2007). By letting us experience one thing in relation to another, such communicative resources are said to structure how we perceive, think, and act (c.f Lakoff and Johnson 1980) and highlighting such framing devices enables an analysis of participant formation and construction of perceptions of climate information credibility (Asplund 2014;cf Pan and Kosicki 1993).…”

Section: Conceptualising Credibiltymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Communicating Climate Science: A Matter of Credibility—Swedish Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate-Change Information

Asplund¹

2018

The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Respon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Conceptualising Credibiltymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conceptualising Credibiltymentioning

confidence: 99%

Communicating Climate Science: A Matter of Credibility—Swedish Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate-Change Information

Asplund¹

2018

The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Respon

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…I en studie fra 2013 og 2014 finner Asplund (2014) at svenske bønder ikke stiller seg avvisende til menneskeskapte klimaendringer, men at de ikke helt tror på klimaforskerne. Her vises det til at vaeret alltid skifter og at bønder har lang erfaring med å tilpasse seg dette på et lokalt nivå.…”

Section: Landbruk Og Klimaendringunclassified

Klima for endring?

Brobakk

2017

NST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SAMMENDRAGMenneskeskapte klimaendringer er en av vår tids store utfordringer, spesielt for landbruket som både er en betydelig bidragsyter og som kan bli hardt rammet gjennom endrede dyrkingsbetingelser. St.meld. nr. 39 (2008St.meld. nr. 39 ( -2009) Klimaendringene -landbruket en del av løsningen bygger på at landbruket skal ta sektoransvar for å bidra til å oppfylle norske klimamål. Dette fordrer driftsendringer og tilpasninger på bruksnivå, og bonden blir dermed en sentral aktør for klimapolitisk måloppnåelse. I denne kvantitative studien ser jeg naermere på norske bønders klimaholdninger, deres landbrukspolitiske prioriteringer, og hva de mener skal til for å iverksette klimatiltak på eget bruk. Analysene baserer seg på en nasjonal representativ survey fra 2011, gjennomført av Norsk senter for bygdeforskning, der klimapolitikk og klimaendring var hovedtema. Denne surveyen er så langt den eneste tilgjengelige av sitt slag.Resultatene viser at selv om bøndene oppfatter klimaendringene som reelle og menneskeskapte, gis det ikke uttrykk for at de oppfattes som akutte. De fremviser derimot en viss løsningsskepsis, som innebaerer at de ser det som mer utfordrende å skulle tilpasse seg ny (klima)politikk enn reelle klimaendringer. I rekken av landbrukspolitiske mål og driftsmessige utfordringer på bruket, prioriteres forhold knyttet til produksjon og driftsøko-nomi sterkere enn tiltak for å redusere utslipp av klimagasser. Økonomiske insentiver, i form av offentlige støtteordninger eller høyere priser, er det som i sterkest grad kan bidra til at man vurderer å gjennomføre klimatiltak på eget bruk. Det gis også klart uttrykk for at andre sektorer bør bidra mer til kutt i klimagassutslipp enn landbruket. Det som i sterkest grad bidrar til å forklare variasjon i klimaholdninger er utdanningsnivå, politiske eller ideologiske faktorer og følelsen av naerhet, det vil si i hvilken grad man oppfatter at klimaendringer er noe som vil påvirke egen virksomhet i fremtiden. Skal man nå klimamålene i landbrukssektoren, må bøndenes motivasjon bli sterkere, og fokus bør ligge på tiltak som ser produksjonsmål, driftsresultat på bruksnivå og klimatiltak i en større sammenheng. Nøkkelord: klimaendring, klimatiltak, bønder, landbrukspolitikk, klimaholdningerThis article is downloaded from www.idunn.no.

show abstract

“…We adopt an interactional approach for our analysis of sense-making processes (Dewulf et al 2009;Asplund 2014). To classify and interpret the world in a meaningful way, Goffman (1974) argues that individuals think in terms of structures called 'frames'.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Frames in adaptation have been researched before with regard to policy discussions (Dewulf 2013, Juhola et al 2011, and individual perceptions (Spence and Pidgeon 2010), demonstrating the need to understand how a new issue becomes captured. Given the interpretative frames and prior experiences of individuals, frame literature suggests that an issue, such as climate change adaptation in agriculture, can be understood in many different ways and from various angles-always in formation, debated and negotiated (Asplund 2014;Findlater et al 2018;Romsdahl et al 2018;Sanderson et al 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making sense of maladaptation: Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need for climate change adaptation has been widely recognised and examples of successful adaptation are increasingly reported in the literature, but little attention has so far been paid to the potential negative impacts of implemented adaptation measures. As the agricultural sector is implementing measures to adapt to or cope with climatic variability and change, the potential negative consequences of these measures need to be explored in order to avoid increased vulnerability or (unintended) environmental impacts. This paper employs serious gaming and focus group methodology to study how agricultural stakeholders in Sweden and Finland frame and negotiate the unintended negative impacts of adaptation measures. The results of our interactional frame analysis suggest that the participants negotiated the potential maladaptive outcomes depending on: (1) whether they agreed that this was indeed a potential consequence of an adaptation measure, (2) whether they considered this to be a negative outcome, and if so whether it was (3) a negative outcome which they could adapt to, (4) a negative outcome that would make it preferable not to adapt at all (5) negotiable in terms of a trade-off with alternative outcomes. While it may be obvious that adaptation options

show abstract

Climate change frames and frame formation : An analysis of climate change communication in the Swedish agricultural sector

Cited by 19 publications

References 144 publications

Communicating Climate Science: A Matter of Credibility—Swedish Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate-Change Information

Communicating Climate Science: A Matter of Credibility—Swedish Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate-Change Information

Klima for endring?

Making sense of maladaptation: Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About