Livestock Health and Farming 2020
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change Mitigation in Livestock Production: Nonconventional Feedstuffs and Alternative Additives

Abstract: Livestock production has widely contributed to increase global production of greenhouse gases (GHG), mostly through digestive fermentation in ruminants. Moreover, emissions derived from livestock are estimated over 14% of the total anthropogenic GHG emissions to atmosphere. In addition, methane emitted from ruminal enteric fermentation is responsible for 25% of the total global methane emissions, which turns livestock activity into a main promoter of the climate change effect. However, these emissions may be d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several comprehensive reviews have described different strategies proposed by the scientific community to reduce enteric methane production and mitigate methane emissions [8][9][10][11][12], but in order to be adopted by beef cattle producers, they should be costeffective and socially acceptable. Rumen defaunation, for instance, has been shown to reduce CH 4 emissions from ruminants by 50%, due to the fact that protozoans are large producers of H 2 with many methanogens among these microorganisms [13]; however, the lack of persistent response due to rapid adaptation and recovery of protozoal numbers along with impractical defaunation methods has limited its use [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several comprehensive reviews have described different strategies proposed by the scientific community to reduce enteric methane production and mitigate methane emissions [8][9][10][11][12], but in order to be adopted by beef cattle producers, they should be costeffective and socially acceptable. Rumen defaunation, for instance, has been shown to reduce CH 4 emissions from ruminants by 50%, due to the fact that protozoans are large producers of H 2 with many methanogens among these microorganisms [13]; however, the lack of persistent response due to rapid adaptation and recovery of protozoal numbers along with impractical defaunation methods has limited its use [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan solo en México, en 2015 se registró un total de emisiones de 510,043 Gg de CO2e (equivalentes de CO2), de los cuales el 13% está relacionado con la actividad ganadera; aproximadamente el 40% de estas emisiones es metano (INECC, 2018). Debido a esto, infinidad de investigaciones alrededor del mundo han tratado de crear diversas estrategias que disminuyan la producción de metano ruminal, a través de: modificaciones en la dieta, el empleo de diversos aditivos, vacunas, uso de extractos naturales, administración de compuestos químicos y, últimamente la suplementación de compuestos bio-activos extraídos de plantas (Martin et al, 2010;Pámanes-Carrasco et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Adicionalmente, la adición de células vivas, como las levaduras, muestran una reducción en la metanogénesis en experimentos in vitro (Hristov et al, 2013). Además, ambas especies (LL y OFI) contienen metabolitos secundarios, tales como taninos condensados, saponinas y/o flavonoides, que pueden actuar como inhibidores de la síntesis de metano (Aye y Adegun, 2013;Alves et al, 2017;Pámanes-Carrasco et al, 2019;). Consecuentemente, el uso de estas especies como fuentes de forraje en la alimentación de rumiantes pueden ser una alternativa en la reducción de las emisiones de GEI, metano principalmente; sin afectar el desarrollo productivo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified