2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change policy networks: Why and how to compare them across countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Are differences a consequence of data-gathering techniques or an indication that different theoretical mechanisms guide the development of policy debates or policy formulation? To date, only a few comparative network studies exist (exceptions include Metz, 2017;Ylä-Anttila et al, 2018) to which we could compare our results in order to address this question. Ingold et al (2020) follow a slightly different goal in their comparison of data on policy preferences that were gathered using surveys and coded consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are differences a consequence of data-gathering techniques or an indication that different theoretical mechanisms guide the development of policy debates or policy formulation? To date, only a few comparative network studies exist (exceptions include Metz, 2017;Ylä-Anttila et al, 2018) to which we could compare our results in order to address this question. Ingold et al (2020) follow a slightly different goal in their comparison of data on policy preferences that were gathered using surveys and coded consultations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded statements made by journalists and individuals as we focused on organizations. Organizations are the principle actors in policymaking and, as such, are what policy network research most often focuses on (Ylä-Anttila et al, 2018a). We made a purposive exception to this rule in the case of individual Inuit news sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dunn (2005) also reports that BP and Shell in the EU were more open to action on the issue than were their US counterparts. Falkner (2008) refers to the same difference between oil firms in the EU and the US, and Ylä-Anttila et al (2018) identify the role of the fossil-fuel industry as a factor explaining differences in climate policy. This industry in Canada has certainly sought to block effective climate policy, mounting an intense, ISSN 2562-8429 although unsuccessful, lobby to stop the Chretien government from ratifying Kyoto in 2002 (Macdonald 2007) and then successfully lobbying for the deregulatory actions of the Harper government in 2012 (Macdonald 2020).…”
Section: Current Explanations For the Different Emission Trajectories In The Eu And Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%