2008
DOI: 10.1002/joc.1718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate fluctuations in the Czech Republic during the period 1961–2005

Abstract: This article addresses climatic fluctuations in the Czech Republic in the period . On the basis of data collected at 23 climatological stations, the fluctuations in monthly, seasonal, and annual series of selected climate variables, homogenized by means of Standard Normal Homogeneity Test (SNHT) (after Alexandersson), are analysed. With almost unchanging temperature continentality expressed by the Gorczyński index, the annual series of mean air temperature, maximum and minimum temperature, daily temperature ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
95
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
16
95
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean annual precipitation distribution in Slovakia, with a maximum value recorded in June and a minimum value recorded in February, coincides with the findings of other researchers studying precipitation distribution over central and eastern Europe [78,79]. From the spatial point of view, the maximum annual precipitation amounts were recorded in the mountainous areas, and the minimum amounts in the southeastern and southwestern lowlands of Slovakia (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mean annual precipitation distribution in Slovakia, with a maximum value recorded in June and a minimum value recorded in February, coincides with the findings of other researchers studying precipitation distribution over central and eastern Europe [78,79]. From the spatial point of view, the maximum annual precipitation amounts were recorded in the mountainous areas, and the minimum amounts in the southeastern and southwestern lowlands of Slovakia (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2a). An SWS decrease at a rate of − 0.1 m s −1 decade −1 from 1961 to 2005 was recorded in the Czech Republic, and the most distinct decrease in the monthly mean SWS was found in November, with a decreasing rate of − 0.2 m s −1 decade −1 (Brazdil et al 2009 Vautard et al (2012Vautard et al ( ) 3.5 (1981Vautard et al ( -2010Vautard et al ( ) − 0.077 (1981 1379 Tobin et al (2014Tobin et al ( ) 3.5 (1981Tobin et al ( -2010Tobin et al ( ) − 0.082 (1981Tobin et al ( -2014 1423 Berrisford et al (2015Berrisford et al ( ) 3.309 (1981Berrisford et al ( -2010 − 0. 087 (1979-2015) 2264 Dunn et al (2016) Europe -− 0.09 (1979-2010 276 Vautard et al (2010) 3.9 (1981) − 0.086 (1981) 410 Vautard et al (2012) 3.8 (1981-2013) − 0.072 (1981-2013 488 Tobin et al (2014Tobin et al ( ) 3.845 (1981Tobin et al ( -2014Tobin et al ( ) − 0.086 (1981Tobin et al ( -2014 522 Berrisford et al (2015Berrisford et al ( ) 3.747 (1981Berrisford et al ( -2010 − 0.…”
Section: Europementioning
confidence: 93%
“…During the period of 1961-2005, the most significant reduction in SWS (− 0.1 m s −1 decade −1 ) occurred in winter in the Czech Republic (Brazdil et al 2009), and an increase in the frequency of lower SWSs was matched by a decrease in the frequency of higher SWSs during the warm season (i.e., April-June) and cold season (i.e., October to March) in northern France from 1974 to 2002 (Najac et al 2009). , respectively, and greater decreases in the U component are observed at higher observation heights .…”
Section: Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies show similar warming trends for areas of the Baltic Sea basin and its vicinity: Finland (Tietäväinen et al 2009 (Brázdil et al 2009), Latvia Klavinš and Rodinov 2010), Estonia (Kont et al 2007(Kont et al , 2011Russak 2009) and for the three Baltic countries together (Kriauciuniene et al 2012). Long and homogeneous time series of spatial mean air temperature were created for Finland covering 1847-2008 (Tietäväinen et al 2009).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 83%