Climate, weather, space weather: model development in an operational context

Abstract

-Aspects of operational modeling for climate, weather, and space weather forecasts are contrasted, with a particular focus on the somewhat conflicting demands of "operational stability" versus "dynamic development" of the involved models. Some common key elements are identified, indicating potential for fruitful exchange across communities. Operational model development is compelling, driven by factors that broadly fall into four categories: model skill, basic physics, advances in computer architecture, and new aspects to be covered, from costumer needs over physics to observational data. Evaluation of model skill as part of the operational chain goes beyond an automated skill score. Permanent interaction between "pure research" and "operational forecast" people is beneficial to both sides. This includes joint model development projects, although ultimate responsibility for the operational code remains with the forecast provider. The pace of model development reflects operational lead times. The points are illustrated with selected examples, many of which reflect the author's background and personal contacts, notably with the Swiss Weather Service and the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. In view of current and future challenges, large collaborations covering a range of expertise are a must À within and across climate, weather, and space weather. To profit from and cope with the rapid progress of computer architectures, supercompute centers must form part of the team.

Generating Ensemble Streamflow Forecasts: A Review of Methods and Approaches Over the Past 40 Years

“…ESMs can be distinguished from global climate models by their ability to simulate the carbon cycle and by the sophistication of their atmospheric and oceanic chemistry (Heavens et al., 2013), in an NWP mode (See Section 4.3). The rationale is that climate can be considered as the long‐term statistical average of weather, and therefore, a good climate model must also manifest good NWP properties (Folini, 2018). As the atmospheric component of the ESM is validated against detailed (pseudo‐)observational data, there is more confidence in the physical ground.…”

An integrated data-driven solar wind – CME numerical framework for space weather forecasting

“…The development of the latter is not an easy task. Building a bridge between research and operations and effective research-to-operations transfer are identified as some of the key challenges (Araujo-Pradere, 2009;Folini, 2018;Merceret et al, 2013). Furthermore, the development of operationally oriented physics-based numerical models, in particular Sun-to-Earth simulations, requires significant computational effort.…”