2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne®CDx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for solid tumors

Abstract: FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) is a United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved companion diagnostic test to identify patients who may benefit from treatment in accordance with the approved therapeutic product labeling for 28 drug therapies. F1CDx utilizes next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) technology to examine 324 cancer genes in solid tumors. F1CDx reports known and likely pathogenic short variants (SVs), copy number alterations (CNAs), and select rear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of panels with faster TAT can estimate TMB, such as the FoundationO-neCDx assay, with a reported median TAT of 10.9 days in 2021. 36 However, recent TMB harmonization effort by Friends of Cancer Research using a common set of cell lines and patient samples determined that TMB calculation can vary considerably from platform to platform, dependent on panel size, gene content, and bioinformatic filtering. 10 The considerable between-platform variability of TMB measurements underscores the importance of demonstrated associations with clinical outcomes per platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of panels with faster TAT can estimate TMB, such as the FoundationO-neCDx assay, with a reported median TAT of 10.9 days in 2021. 36 However, recent TMB harmonization effort by Friends of Cancer Research using a common set of cell lines and patient samples determined that TMB calculation can vary considerably from platform to platform, dependent on panel size, gene content, and bioinformatic filtering. 10 The considerable between-platform variability of TMB measurements underscores the importance of demonstrated associations with clinical outcomes per platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, genomic DNA from resected tumor tissue was collected and extracted as described previously [ 14 ]. The CGP of tumor DNA was performed retrospectively using a method adapted from the study by Milbury et al to identify patient-specific alterations [ 29 ]. Briefly, the DNA was extracted from FFPE archival patient samples and was end-repaired, A-tailed, and adapters were ligated, followed by hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the Illumina ® HiSeq 4000 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive genomic profiling is approved by FDA and has undergone many validations [ 23 , 24 ]. However, to confirm its results, we explored and compared its compatibility with locally performed BRCA testing and immunohistochemistry testing for TP53 mutations in patients at a single institution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%