1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67073-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Biochemical Evidence of Control of Prostate Cancer at 5 Years After External Beam Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, the most significant cutoff which revealed a difference in biochemical failure was a PSA of 20 ng/ml; patients with PSA > 20 had only a 34% FFBF at 4 years. These results are similar to those found after both radical prostatectomy and external beam irradiation [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our series, the most significant cutoff which revealed a difference in biochemical failure was a PSA of 20 ng/ml; patients with PSA > 20 had only a 34% FFBF at 4 years. These results are similar to those found after both radical prostatectomy and external beam irradiation [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, with the advent of more sophisticated follow‐up evaluations, notably serial PSA determinations and repeat biopsies, the local failure rates were found to be much higher than once thought 26, 29‐35. Table 5 shows 5‐year and 10‐year outcome comparisons between the brachytherapy study and several external beam irradiation series 33, 36‐42. These data suggest that patients treated with brachytherapy with or without 45‐Gy external beam radiation supplement fare better than patients treated with external beam irradiation as monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Most large single-institution series now report that pretreatment serum prostatespecific antigen (PSA) values, Gleason score (GS), and palpation stage are significant independent predictors of a successful outcome following either surgery or radiation therapy. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] A successful outcome now requires that the patient has no PSA-based evidence of relapse with long-term follow-up. 1,2,7,8,17 Longterm follow-up for patients treated with external beam radiation in the PSA era (since 1988 when PSA values began to direct earlier diagnosis) is limited to fewer than 10 years; thus, most singleinstitution series have only a small number of treated patients with follow-up of more than 5 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%