2017
DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and biological analysis in graftless maxillary sinus lift

Abstract: Maxillary sinus lift for dental implant installation is a well-known and versatile technique; new techniques are presented based on the physiology of intrasinus bone repair. The aim of this review was to determine the status of graftless maxillary sinus lift and analyze its foundations and results. A search was conducted of the literature between 1995 and 2015 in the Medline, ScienceDirect, and SciELO databases using the keywords “maxillary sinus lift,” “blood clot,” “graftless maxillary sinus augmentation,” a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Triplett et al (2009) compared differences in the bone height and width with autogenous bone and rhBMP-2 in maxillary sinus lifts. However, this clinical model had significant features which were not considered (e. g. presence of adjacent teeth, degree of sinus pneumatization and corticalisation of the adjacent bone) and therefore this change may not be associated solely with the type of material used but due to clinical variables (Parra et al, 2017). In the authors' opinion, it is more difficult to study the real impact of biomaterials in horizontal or vertical defects of the alveolar ridge than in other situations requiring bone augmentation, such as maxillary sinus lifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triplett et al (2009) compared differences in the bone height and width with autogenous bone and rhBMP-2 in maxillary sinus lifts. However, this clinical model had significant features which were not considered (e. g. presence of adjacent teeth, degree of sinus pneumatization and corticalisation of the adjacent bone) and therefore this change may not be associated solely with the type of material used but due to clinical variables (Parra et al, 2017). In the authors' opinion, it is more difficult to study the real impact of biomaterials in horizontal or vertical defects of the alveolar ridge than in other situations requiring bone augmentation, such as maxillary sinus lifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve stable and successful outcomes, the condition of the maxillary sinus should be healthy, and the sinus membrane must not be perforated during surgery. This technique is recommended in cases of residual bone height >5 mm, with new bone formation expected to be approximately 3 mm 15 , 16 .…”
Section: Types Of Sinus Membrane Elevation Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and the quantity of the bone have to be sufficient for implant placement. Posterior maxilla often presents with insufficiently available bone for the placement of implants due to the pneumatization of maxillary sinus and resorbed ridge (1,2) . The initial implant stability is poor coupled with inadequate bone height for the implant length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%