Objectives: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a common problem in pregnancy due to the morphological and the physiological changes that take place in the genitourinary tract during pregnancy. Screening methods may be useful, because a full bacteriological analysis could be reserved for those patients who are symptomatic or those who have positive screening test results. The exact prevalence of UTI in rural, pregnant women is unknown. The present study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of UTI in pregnant women and for ascertaining the utility of the Griess Nitrite test and the Urinary Pus Cell Count of ≥5 cells per micro litre test for the screening or the early detection of UTI in them at primary health care clinics. Occurrence of urinary complaints was compared in UTI and non UTI women.
Method:We conducted a study on 300 randomly selected, pregnant women from rural areas. Urine cultures, pus-cell counts and the Griess nitrite test were used for diagnosis of UTI. The screening tests for UTI were evaluated in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and the percentage of correctly classified.
Results:In the present study, the prevalence of UTI was found to be 29/300 (9.6%, 95% confidence interval 9.57-9.63). The specificities of the two screening tests were comparable (97.05% and 94.47%). Also, the negative predictive values of the two tests were almost similar (97.77% and 96.96%). The percentage of correctly classified by the Griess nitrite test and the urine pus cell count were found to be 95.33% and 92.33% respectively. The proportion of the women with various urinary complaints was significantly higher (P<0.00) in the UTI subjects as compared to that in the non-UTI subjects.
Conclusion:Urine culture remains the gold standard for the detection of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The Nitrite test of uncentrifuged urine was observed to be the best among the screening tests which were evaluated in terms of their efficiency and validity.
InTROduCTIOnUrinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a common problem in pregnancy due to the morphological and the physiological changes that take place in the genitourinary tract during pregnancy [1]. It can be symptomatic or asymptomatic [2]. The prevalence of UTI in India was reported to be 3.14-19.87% [3][4][5]. A high prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria was found, which was 19.87% and 4.34% respectively [5]. Most of the centres perform a routine analysis of the midstream urine specimen during one or more antenatal visits. However, a full bacteriological analysis is both time-consuming and expensive and a vast majority of the antenatal urine specimens will be negative to the culture [1]. Screening methods may be useful because a full bacteriological analysis could be reserved for those patients who are symptomatic or those who have a positive screening test results. The upper urinary tract infections in particular, may lead to significant morbidity for both the mother and foetus [6]. Bacteriur...