2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01238-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and patient-centered implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes in low-and-middle income countries: a systematic review

Abstract: Background The prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes is rising in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), affecting all age categories and resulting in huge socioeconomic implications. Mobile health (mHealth) is a potential high-impact approach to improve clinical and patient-centered outcomes despite the barriers of cost, language, literacy, and internet connectivity. Therefore, it is valuable to examine the clinical and implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for Type 2 Diabetes in LMICs. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendation of exercise must be individualized and centered on the patient with diabetes, and a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, which can be optimized by including graduates in physical activity and sports sciences in therapeutic teams. Mobile health interventions (mHealth) can represent an alternative or complement to face-to-face programs, although their results still require further effectiveness studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommendation of exercise must be individualized and centered on the patient with diabetes, and a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, which can be optimized by including graduates in physical activity and sports sciences in therapeutic teams. Mobile health interventions (mHealth) can represent an alternative or complement to face-to-face programs, although their results still require further effectiveness studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes a diabetes digital intervention. Globally, there are multiple studies demonstrating the effectiveness of digital interventions [12][13][14][15][16][17]28,29], but there are limited studies conducted in Southeast Asia, particularly in Muslim-dominant populations [16]. This study will be useful for health care professionals and policy makers to understand the possible barriers to the implementation process during the subsequent phases of rolling out an app for T2DM management as a nationwide digital health solution in Brunei [19].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu, penelitian dengan periode intervensi yang lebih lama memiliki ukuran efek yang lebih tinggi dan perbedaan persentase pada HbA1c (1,52-2,92%). Hasil implementasi yang berpusat pada pasien dilaporkan bervariasi (Mokaya et al, 2022) Perbedaan rata-rata kadar HbA1c pada pengukuran kedua antara kelompok intervensi dengan kelompok kontrol adalah 1,54,2 %, dimana nilai rata-rata kadar HbA1c kelompok lebih kecil sebesar 1,542 %. Rata-rata kadar HbA1c pada kelompok intervensi sebelum latihan senam low impact adalah 8,995 % dengan standar deviasi sebesar 1,7998 % dan standar error sebesar 0,4129 %, sedangkan Rata-rata kadar HbA1c sesudah latihan senam low impact adalah 8,658 % dengan standar deviasi sebesar 1,7942 % dan standar error sebesar 0,4116 %.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified