Objective: This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers to healthy dietary behaviour in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Kenya. Design: A qualitative descriptive design using telephone interviews was applied. An interview guide was developed through a modified theoretical framework. Setting: This study was conducted in selected hospitals in Nakuru County, located in west-central Kenya. Participants: A two-step sampling strategy was used to select hospitals and study participants. Adult participants aged 30 to 85 years old, with T2DM from six hospitals were selected based on their ability to openly elaborate on the theme of dietary behaviour. Results: Thirty respondents were interviewed (mean age 62 years; 43.3% females). The average duration of the interviews was 32:02 minutes (SD 17.07). The highest-ranking internal facilitators of healthy dietary behaviour were knowledge of healthy food choices, gardening, self-efficacy, food preparation skills and eating at home. External facilitators included inaccurate beliefs and information on food and diet, education by healthcare workers, food availability, proximity to food selling points and family support. Internal barriers included tastes and preferences, health conditions barring intake of certain foods, and random eating of unhealthy foods. External barriers included socioeconomic factors, seasonal unavailability of fruits and food safety concerns. Conclusions: Facilitators and barriers to healthy dietary behaviour among Kenyan adults with T2DM are related to food literacy and include selection, preparation and eating. Interventions to enhance healthy dietary behaviour should target context-specific knowledge, skills and self-efficacy.

Background The prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes is rising in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), affecting all age categories and resulting in huge socioeconomic implications. Mobile health (mHealth) is a potential high-impact approach to improve clinical and patient-centered outcomes despite the barriers of cost, language, literacy, and internet connectivity. Therefore, it is valuable to examine the clinical and implementation outcomes of mHealth interventions for Type 2 Diabetes in LMICs. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were applied in framing and reporting the review criteria. A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid databases was performed through a combination of search terms. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published in English between January 2010 and August 2021 were included. Risk of bias for missing results in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to synthesize the results. Results The search identified a total of 1161 articles. Thirty studies from 14 LMICs met the eligibility criteria. On clinical outcomes, 12 and 9 studies reported on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c )and fasting blood glucose (FBG) respectively. Text messages was the most commonly applied mHealth approach, used in 19 out of the 30 studies. Ten out of the 12 studies (83.3%) that reported on HbA1c had a percentage difference of <0.3% between the mHealth intervention and the comparison group. Additionally, studies with longer intervention periods had higher effect size and percentage difference on HbA1c (1.52 to 2.92%). Patient-centred implementation outcomes were reported variedly, where feasibility was reported in all studies. Acceptability was reported in nine studies, appropriateness in six studies and cost in four studies. mHealth evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) guidelines were not applied in all the studies in this review.   Conclusion mHealth interventions in LMICs are associated with clinically significant effectiveness on HbA1 but have low effectiveness on FBG. The application of mERA guidelines may standardize reporting of patient-centered implementation outcomes in LMICs. Trial registration PROSPERO: Registration ID 154209.

Purpose Patients with prior bariatric surgery (BS) are at risk to develop alcohol use disorder (AUD) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Severe alcoholic hepatitis (sAH) is one of the most severe manifestations of ALD with a 28-day mortality of 20-50%. The impact of prior BS on patients presenting with sAH was assessed. Methods From 01/2008 to 04/2021, consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary referral center with biopsy-proven sAH were included in a database. Results One hundred fifty-eight sAH patients of which 28 patients had a history of BS (BS group) were identified. Of this BS group, 24 patients underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 3 a biliopancreatic diversion, 1 an adjustable gastric band, and no patients a sleeve gastrectomy. The proportion of patients with BS increased threefold over time during the study period. Patients in the BS group were significantly younger at diagnosis of sAH (44.3 years vs 52.4 years), were more frequently female, and had a higher body mass index and a higher grade of steatosis on liver biopsy. The correlation between BS and a younger age at diagnosis remained significant in a multivariate regression analysis. There were no differences in disease severity between both groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in corticosteroid response, 28-day, 90-day, or 1-year survival. Conclusion Prior BS is independently associated with a younger age of presentation with sAH, but is not independently associated with a different disease severity or outcome. These findings support the need for early detection of AUD in patients who underwent BS, in particular RYGB. KeywordBariatric surgery; Complications; Epidemiology; Alcoholic hepatitis Key Points • The fraction of sAH patients with prior bariatric surgery (BS) increased over time. • These patients are significantly younger at diagnosis than those without prior BS. • Awareness for alcohol-related liver disease in patients with prior BS is necessary. Lukas Van Melkebeke, Annelotte G.C. Broekhoven, and Tessa Ostyn shared first authorship.

No abstract