2017
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and therapeutic implications of BRAF mutation heterogeneity in metastatic melanoma

Abstract: Heterogeneity of BRAF mutation in melanoma has been a controversial subject. Quantitative data on BRAF allele frequency (AF) are sparse, and the potential relationship with response to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) in patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. We quantitatively measured BRAF AF in a cohort of treatment naïve metastatic melanoma samples by pyrosequencing and correlated with survival data in patients treated with BRAFi as part of their clinical care. Fifty-two samples from 50 patients were analysed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, such differential results may reflect the high degree of intra-tumoral heterogeneity often observed with BRAF V600E mutations. This aspect has been noted in previous studies [31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Taken together, such differential results may reflect the high degree of intra-tumoral heterogeneity often observed with BRAF V600E mutations. This aspect has been noted in previous studies [31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“… Samples Methods Number (%) of Heterogeneous Tumors Overall Among BRAF Mutated Tumors [76] 5 PT scPCR, Sanger seq 4/5 (80%) 4/4 (100%) [85] 49 PT IHC 29/49 (59%) 29/31 (94%) [86] 50 PT 139 MT HRM, qPCR, IHC 25/189 (13%) 25/88 (28%) [87] 20 PT IHC 2/20 (10%) 2/7 (29%) [88] 100 PT PNA qPCR, IHC, NGS, Cap seq 7/100 (7%) 7/59 (12%) [89] 124 PT 76 MT IHC 10/200 (5%) 10/94 (11%) [90] 22 MI1S 56 PT 93 MT Pyro, IHC 2/171 (1%) 2/75 (3%) [91] 140 PT 171 MT IHC 0/239 (0%) 0/137 (0%) Overall 79/973 (8.1%) 79/495 (16.0%) [63] 104 NT from TCGA NGS BRAF-M% ranged from 8% to 97% [92] 75 PT 88 MT NGS BRAF-M% ranged from 0% to 92% (median for PT: 28% and for MT: 26%) [63] 475 NT Pyro, qPCR, dPCR BRAF-M% ranged from 10% to 90%. [93] 9 PT LCM, Direct seq, SNaPshot assay BRAF-M% ranged from 0% to 81% [94] 52 MT ...…”
Section: Intratumor Heterogeneity In Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to perform an analysis of multiple biopsies within all tumors with very high accuracy to detect rare mutations present commonly in small subclones. Due to intratumor heterogeneity, a single biopsy may be insufficient for the evaluation of the alterations landscape of the whole tumor [15] , [33] , [67] , [94] , [103] , [108] , [205] . For instance, Lake et al [113] established that biopsies of an extraocular, thereby more accessible, part of UM may not represent a whole tumor spectrum of mutations.…”
Section: Implications For Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these individuals, the addition of BRAF targeted therapy to the radiation treatment was shown to have significant benefit, thus making the potential establishment of a noninvasive diagnostic method even more valuable 37 . In addition, recent evidence has demonstrated a discrepancy between the genetics of the primary tumor and its CNS metastasis in 13.4% of cases and in 7% of lesions in patients with polymetastatic disease 38,39 . Thus, the need for the development of a noninvasive tool that allows sequential evaluation of the genetic status of multiple metastases is clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%