1956
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-91-22338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, Bacteriological, and Serological Observations of two Human Volunteers Following Ingestion of Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No animal models existed to demonstrate pathogenicity and no other recognized virulence properties were identifiable by which to differentiate the diarrhea-associated strains from other E. coli. Accordingly, in the early 1950s several groups carried out challenge studies in humans involving oral feeding of EPEC serotypes (95,195,220,221,297,393). Four groups of investigators reported feeding studies in humans with EPEC strains of serogroup 0111; these are summarized in Table 8.…”
Section: Epecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No animal models existed to demonstrate pathogenicity and no other recognized virulence properties were identifiable by which to differentiate the diarrhea-associated strains from other E. coli. Accordingly, in the early 1950s several groups carried out challenge studies in humans involving oral feeding of EPEC serotypes (95,195,220,221,297,393). Four groups of investigators reported feeding studies in humans with EPEC strains of serogroup 0111; these are summarized in Table 8.…”
Section: Epecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data derived from volunteer studies with adults (52,66,105,125,127,213) and from a small number of documented outbreaks among adults show that disease does occur but the infective inoculum is high (126). The reason for the marked resistance of adults to infection is not clear; the antibody response to the O antigen of certain 0 serogroups is age related, and Neter et al (149) proposed that exposure to EPEC during childhood conferred immunity in later life.…”
Section: Current Aspects Of Epec Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…antisera [6][7][8]. Although no biochemical, microbiological or animal-model assays at that time could demonstrate an inherent pathogenicity vis-a-vis other E. coli, experimental challenge studies in the early 1950s in the United States, England, and Japan confirmed that strains of serogroups 055, 0111, and 0127, isolated from infants with gastroenteritis, caused diarrhea when fed to volunteers [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Also at this time, Ewing et al [6,8,15] in the United States and Taylor [7] in England noted that among all the EPEC, certain 0 serogroups, including 026, 055, 0111, 0119, 0127, and 0128, were particularly frequent and epidemiologically well-incriminated in association with diarrhea, whereas isolates of other EPEC 0 serogroups, such as 044, 086, and 0114, were less common.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%