1991
DOI: 10.1159/000129173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, Biological, and Histological Follow-up during Intestinal Adaptation after Small-Bowel Resection in the Dog

Abstract: Massive resections of the intestine including the ileocecal valve are associated with a high mortality. This model of short bowel in the dog consists of an extensive small-bowel resection (remaining jejunum 25 cm) associated with colectomy. Small-bowel adaptation is evidenced by increases of crypt depth (p = 0.02) and villus height (p = 0.001) in animals fed per os. Plasma glutamine levels decrease after surgery, while there is a significant decrease of plasma alanine levels (p < 0.001). This model should allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study demonstrate that supplementation of glutamine by bolus had no apparent beneficial effects on the intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection, since it did not improve the intestinal mucosa weight, ileal DNA, RNA, protein concentrations, sucrose activity, or the intestinal morphology when compared to glycine or saline. The adaptive process was similar to previous resection studies and all markers of intestinal adaptation were significantly enhanced 10 days after resection [15, 16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results of this study demonstrate that supplementation of glutamine by bolus had no apparent beneficial effects on the intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection, since it did not improve the intestinal mucosa weight, ileal DNA, RNA, protein concentrations, sucrose activity, or the intestinal morphology when compared to glycine or saline. The adaptive process was similar to previous resection studies and all markers of intestinal adaptation were significantly enhanced 10 days after resection [15, 16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In conclusion, since the small bowel has the ability to increase its absorptive area over time [16], our study in a pre‐clinical model suggests that transplanting the small bowel alone and supporting the recipients in the initial post‐operative period may be preferable to risking higher rejection and contamination rates seen when transplanting the ileocecal valve or the colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%