Advancing age is the major risk factor for chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer and Alzheimer's disease. The rising number of older individuals is thus resulting in an increased burden on our healthcare system. Instead of tackling each of these age-related diseases one by one, focused approaches aimed at the identification of shared disease mechanisms, that can ideally be targeted using lifestyle and/or pharmacological interventions, could be more productive. But, how do we identify the vulnerable people in the population that are at high risk for developing (multi) morbidity? This is a question that the research community tries to answer by looking for so-called biomarkers of ageing, i.e. markers that are predictive of age-related morbidity and mortality. When they are successfully identified, such markers can be used as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials or intervention studies that are aimed at improving general health.According to the criteria of the American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR) a perfect biomarker of ageing should; (a) outperform chronological age in predicting age-related disease and mortality, (b) be simple (i.e. accurate and reproducible) and inexpensive to test without harming the test subject, and (c) work in both humans and model organisms to make findings directly translatable [1]. Several potential biomarkers of ageing have been proposed [2], including clinical markers involved in physiological (e.g. fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin, and blood lipids) and immune function (e.g. C-reactive protein), but, thus far, none has met all the proposed AFAR criteria.Many of the proposed biomarkers have shown to be associated with the risk of specific age-related diseases, e.g. an imbalance in fasting glucose or blood lipids has been associated with the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease, respectively. However, it is still unclear if these biomarkers are able to predict