2016
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric patients with CMV DNA detection in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Abstract: CMV is frequently recovered from BAL specimens but does not usually indicate acute CMV pulmonary disease. We would suggest that other diagnoses be considered first, even if CMV is recovered. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:112-118. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1988, CMV detection by rapid culture of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid became the mainstay of diagnosis for CMV pneumonia [4]. However, while CMV DNA-specific PCR is widely used as a surveillance method for blood and serum specimens and because many laboratories have largely abandoned traditional virologic techniques, the usefulness of quantitative PCR of BAL as a diagnostic tool for CMV pneumonia is poorly defined [5][6][7][8], and the recently updated international definition guidelines provide only limited definitive evidence for using PCR as an acceptable test for disease diagnosis [9,10]. The key reason for the dilemma is that the presence of CMV DNA may not constitute disease, owing to the well-described phenomenon of pulmonary CMV shedding [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988, CMV detection by rapid culture of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid became the mainstay of diagnosis for CMV pneumonia [4]. However, while CMV DNA-specific PCR is widely used as a surveillance method for blood and serum specimens and because many laboratories have largely abandoned traditional virologic techniques, the usefulness of quantitative PCR of BAL as a diagnostic tool for CMV pneumonia is poorly defined [5][6][7][8], and the recently updated international definition guidelines provide only limited definitive evidence for using PCR as an acceptable test for disease diagnosis [9,10]. The key reason for the dilemma is that the presence of CMV DNA may not constitute disease, owing to the well-described phenomenon of pulmonary CMV shedding [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burgener et al reported on the clinical outcome of patients with positive CMV‐DNA detection in BAL. This is an important topic, as the definitive identification of CMV infection versus simple presence of the virus can only be established by tissue biopsy, which is often not available in children.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testing/endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vergera et al [7] founded that cytomegalovirus (CMV ) detected positive in BALF from critically ill patients was associated with longer hospital length of stay ( HLOS ) and higher mortality rate. Meanwhile, another study on pediatric patients whose CMV DNA was detected from BALF concluded that the CMV was commonly found in BALF, which didn't mean acute dominant CMV infection and wouldn't be regarded as the rst primary diagnose [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%