A ccurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is an essential feature of any trial aiming to determine the relationship between BP reduction and outcome. BP control was the source of a controversy surrounding the results of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial, which claimed additional benefits from the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) versus placebo, because the between-group difference in clinic BP (CBP) was only 3/2 mm Hg.1 The beneficial effect was estimated to be 3 times that expected for this small difference in BP, 2 however, the possibility of a greater difference in BP was suggested by a small substudy of HOPE that measured ambulatory BP (ABP) and found a between-group difference of 10/4 mm Hg.
3ABP does not exactly mirror CBP, even if a fixed correction factor is used and the timing of the CBP measurement during the day is taken into account, for example, by comparing morning ABP values with morning CBP. The difference between CBP and ABP also depends on the degree of the alarm response induced in the office and varies from person to person, method of measurement, and the observer. This office or alarm response tends to increase with age 4,5 and decrease with the familiarity with the measurement. Furthermore, the machine used to measure ABP or CBP may over-or underestimate BP. When CBP is above normal and ABP is judged to be normal, then white coat hypertension (WCH) is said to be present. Importantly, it has long been considered desirable to avoid pharmaceutical treatment in those with WCH, because it has been suggested that active treatment does not lower ABP in this condition and also does not reduce cardiovascular events. Abstract-White coat hypertension is considered to be a benign condition that does not require antihypertensive treatment.Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was measured in 284 participants in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET), a double-blind randomized trial of indapamide sustained release 1.5 mg±perindopril 2 to 4 mg versus matching placebo in hypertensive subjects (systolic blood pressure 160-199 mm Hg) aged >80 years. ABP recordings (Diasys Integra II) were obtained in 112 participants at baseline and 186 after an average follow-up of 13 months. At baseline, clinic blood pressure (CBP) exceeded the morning ABP by 32/10 mm Hg. Fifty percent of participants fulfilled the established criteria for white coat hypertension. The highest ABP readings were in the morning (average 140/80 mm Hg), the average night-time pressure was low at 124/72 mm Hg, and the average 24-hour blood pressure was 133/77 mm Hg. During follow-up, the systolic/diastolic blood pressure placebo-active differences averaged 6/5 mm Hg for morning ABP, 8/5 mm Hg for 24-hour ABP, and 13/5 mm Hg for CBP. The lowering of blood pressure over 24 hours supports the reduction in blood pressure with indapamide sustained release±perindopril as the explanation for the reduction in total mortality and cardiovascular events observed in the main HYVET study. Because we es...