2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical diagnostic tools for vitamin D assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) systems over recent years [11,[76][77][78][79], have led to reports of many new forms of vitamin D3 in human serum. Binding of vitamin D metabolites, particularly 25(OH)D, to DBP makes direct analysis of aqueous (serum) samples difficult [11].…”
Section: Liquid Chromatography Tandem-mass Spectrometry Of Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) systems over recent years [11,[76][77][78][79], have led to reports of many new forms of vitamin D3 in human serum. Binding of vitamin D metabolites, particularly 25(OH)D, to DBP makes direct analysis of aqueous (serum) samples difficult [11].…”
Section: Liquid Chromatography Tandem-mass Spectrometry Of Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that nearly 1 billion people are vitamin D deficient worldwide, either due to reduced sun exposure or insufficient dietary intake. Vitamin D deficiency is implicated in many diseases, but these associations lack clarity [ 1 , 2 ]. Studies on the role of vitamin D in health and disease have been hampered by the difficulty of the assays required, which, in turn, arises from the complex number of the vitamin D metabolites and issues in separating them for detection [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assay methods contributed largely to the discrepancy among these studies. There are many ways to detect the serum vitamin D levels which have different sensitivities and specificities ( 49 ). Till now there is no single ideal technique to synthesize the strengths of different test methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%