2020
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Effects of Radiofrequency Coblation for Adult Laryngopharyngeal Vascular Lesions

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility and efficacy of transoral radiofrequency coblation surgery (TRS) in the treatment of adult laryngopharyngeal vascular lesion (LVL). Methods A total of 15 patients with LVL were retrospectively studied, including 11 capillary lesions and five cavernous lesions (there was one case with two separate lesions). All of the lesions were treated with TRS alone (capillary lesion) or with a combination of TRS and sclerotherapy (cavernous lesion). The treatment efficacy was evaluated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our patient cohort, therapeutic effects were evaluated by clinical manifestations, physical examination, nasal fiberendoscopy, and/or postoperative imaging examination (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). According to the evaluation criteria in previous publications, 14,20,21 four levels of therapeutic efficacy were listed: level I, tumor was unchanged or even increased in size; level II, tumor significantly reduced in size, but less than 1/2; level III, tumor reduced by more than 1/2, but did not disappear completely; level IV, tumor totally disappeared without functional loss and recurrence at least 6 months. All patients were scheduled to clinic observations 1 month after surgery, and then followed-up every 3 to 6 months; 96.9% (n = 94) of patients had a full-range postoperative follow-up and intact clinical information was gathered; 3 patients were lost in our follow-up due to the changes of contact ways.…”
Section: Curative Effect Judgment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our patient cohort, therapeutic effects were evaluated by clinical manifestations, physical examination, nasal fiberendoscopy, and/or postoperative imaging examination (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). According to the evaluation criteria in previous publications, 14,20,21 four levels of therapeutic efficacy were listed: level I, tumor was unchanged or even increased in size; level II, tumor significantly reduced in size, but less than 1/2; level III, tumor reduced by more than 1/2, but did not disappear completely; level IV, tumor totally disappeared without functional loss and recurrence at least 6 months. All patients were scheduled to clinic observations 1 month after surgery, and then followed-up every 3 to 6 months; 96.9% (n = 94) of patients had a full-range postoperative follow-up and intact clinical information was gathered; 3 patients were lost in our follow-up due to the changes of contact ways.…”
Section: Curative Effect Judgment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Due to its rarity, scattered case reports regarding the clinical management of ANPLH in nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and/or larynx are available. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] However, no large-scale investigations focusing on ANPLH have been published. Therefore, our current study aims to clarify the clinical features, classification, and therapeutic strategies of patients with ANPLH based on a relatively large sample size, which will deepen our understanding of ANPLH and standardize the clinical management for these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation