Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial

Ranjitha, GR; Vikram, R; Meena, N; Vijayalakshmi, L.; Murthy, Chethana S

doi:10.4103/jcd.jcd_51_20

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dental resin composite is one of the most widely used restorative materials, exceeding 166 million restorations completed in the United States (U.S.) solely [ 1 ]. The clinical success of composite restoration depends on the properties of the dental adhesive [ 2 ]. Both dentin and enamel are diverse compositionally, and bond to resin composite material using different mechanisms [ 3 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin Bond Integrity of Filled and Unfilled Resin Adhesive Enhanced with Silica Nanoparticles—An SEM, EDX, Micro-Raman, FTIR and Micro-Tensile Bond Strength Study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to synthesize and assess unfilled and filled (silica nanoparticles) dentin adhesive polymer. Methods encompassing scanning electron microscopy (SEM)—namely, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) test, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and micro-Raman spectroscopy—were utilized to investigate Si particles’ shape and incorporation, dentin bond toughness, degree of conversion (DC), and adhesive–dentin interaction. The Si particles were incorporated in the experimental adhesive (EA) at 0, 5, 10, and 15 wt. % to yield Si-EA-0% (negative control group), Si-EA-5%, Si-EA-10%, and Si-EA-15% groups, respectively. Teeth were set to form bonded samples using adhesives in four groups for µTBS testing, with and without aging. Si particles were spherical shaped and resin tags having standard penetrations were detected on SEM micrographs. The EDX analysis confirmed the occurrence of Si in the adhesive groups (maximum in the Si-EA-15% group). Micro-Raman spectroscopy revealed the presence of characteristic peaks at 638, 802, and 1300 cm−1 for the Si particles. The µTBS test revealed the highest mean values for Si-EA-15% followed by Si-EA-10%. The greatest DC was appreciated for the control group trailed by the Si-EA-5% group. The addition of Si particles of 15 and 10 wt. % in dentin adhesive showed improved bond strength. The addition of 15 wt. % resulted in a bond strength that was superior to all other groups. The Si-EA-15% group demonstrated acceptable DC, suitable dentin interaction, and resin tag formation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin Bond Integrity of Filled and Unfilled Resin Adhesive Enhanced with Silica Nanoparticles—An SEM, EDX, Micro-Raman, FTIR and Micro-Tensile Bond Strength Study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…28 In that sense, universal adhesives applied through etchand-rinse and selective-etch modes tend to achieve better clinical outcomes. 2,5,6,8 In our study, the group without selective enamel conditioning presented high initial debonding rates, and SBU, the lowest 3-year cumulative survival (89%). Some clinical studies evaluating universal adhesive restorations , based on USPHS or World Dental Federation (Fédération Dentaire Internationale -FDI) criteria, and 6 to 36-month follow-ups, also reported few clinical changes over time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 44%

“…Some clinical studies evaluating universal adhesive restorations , based on USPHS or World Dental Federation (Fédération Dentaire Internationale -FDI) criteria, and 6 to 36-month follow-ups, also reported few clinical changes over time. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The RMGIC group showed a cumulative survival retention (98%) similar to other clinical trials assessing the same ionomer brand (Vitremer) after 5 years (93-96.4%). 17,29 According to , EDTA conditioning improves self-etching adhesive restoration retention rates 18 months after the procedures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

“…1 Resin composites and glass-ionomer cements are currently the material of choice for NCCL restorations. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Resin composites have some advantages, such as rapid polymerization, easy handling and reparability, and good mechanical and aesthetic properties; 12 however, they also entail biological effects due to monomers release. 13 This material peculiar features also pose challenges for its adhesion to the dentin substrate in NCCL.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strategies. Methodology: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. An adhesive restorative system (Single Bond Universal/Filtek Z350XT -SBU) was evaluated both without and with selective enamel conditioning (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid pretreatment (EDTA; E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations, placed in 50 patients, were evaluated at baseline and at a 3-year follow-up using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using the two-proportion equality test, multinomial logistic regression, Wilcoxon test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: In total, 42 (84%) patients returned for the 3-year follow-up. SBU showed restoration losses statistically different from RMGIC. Retention was also statistically different in SBU between baseline and the 3-year follow-up. Marginal defects and surface texture were statistically significant for all groups in the period studied, except for the surface texture of SBU and the marginal integrity in E-RMGIC. We observed no statistically significant difference in wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, and color over time. Recession degree was the only factor to influence retention rates. Cumulative survival (%) was 89, 98, 98, and 95.3, for SBU, SE-SBU, RMGIC, and E-RMGIC, respectively, without significant differences among them. There was a statistically significant difference between survival curves; however, multiple comparison procedures found no statistical differences. Conclusion: Selective enamel etching affected the retention of non-carious cervical restorations. Adhesion using EDTA and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements delayed marginal defects over time. The degree of gingival recession influenced retention rates. Resin composite restorations showed initial marginal defects, and ionomer restorations, reduced surface luster. EDTA pre-treatment followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may be a promising adhesion strategy for NCCL restorations.

show abstract

“…14 Ancak çürüksüz servikal lezyonlar üzerinde yapılan bir başka çalışmada, universal adezivin self-etch modunda kullanıldığı grupta 1 yıl sonunda retansiyon kaybı rapor edilmiştir. 15 Kullanılan adeziv sistemin yanı sıra çürük lezyonunun yeri, boyutu, çiğneme kuvvetleri ve çiğneme alışkanlıkları da retansiyon kriterlerini etkiler.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

One-Year Evaluation of Posterior Composite Restorations Performed Using Three Different Adhesive Techniques: A Clinical Study

Bayraktar¹,

Çelik²,

BİBEROĞLU³

et al. 2022

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diş çürüğü, günümüzde hâlâ insanoğlunu etkileyen önemli bir sorun olmaya devam etmekte ve bu nedenle dünyada her yıl milyonlarca diş dolgusu yapılmaktadır. Çürük nedeniyle yapılan dolguların yanı sıra daha önce yapılmış bazı restorasyonların da değiştirildiği bir gerçektir. Adeziv sistemler kullanılarak yapılan direkt kompozit rezin restorasyonlar, bu restorasyonlar arasında en yaygın olanıdır. 1

show abstract

Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

Dentin Bond Integrity of Filled and Unfilled Resin Adhesive Enhanced with Silica Nanoparticles—An SEM, EDX, Micro-Raman, FTIR and Micro-Tensile Bond Strength Study

Dentin Bond Integrity of Filled and Unfilled Resin Adhesive Enhanced with Silica Nanoparticles—An SEM, EDX, Micro-Raman, FTIR and Micro-Tensile Bond Strength Study

Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial

One-Year Evaluation of Posterior Composite Restorations Performed Using Three Different Adhesive Techniques: A Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About