Clinical ethics support services in paediatric practice: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review on structures, interventions and outcomes

Abstract

IntroductionClinical ethics support services (CESS) have been developing worldwide with growing interest in evaluating their quality. Paediatric-specific CESSs (p-CESS) have received little attention, and evidence from adult services might not be generalisable. Evidence on service models and practices is crucial to inform further research and debate on quality evaluation and minimum standards for p-CESSs. We aim to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise evidence for p-CESS structures, processes and outcomes.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a mixed-studies systematic review including peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English or Spanish language providing data on the evaluation and/or impact on any aspect of p-CESS. We will search seven electronic databases: MEDLINE, Philosopher’s Index, EMBASE, PsycINFO, LILACS, Web of Science and CINHAL, without filters applied. Search terms will be related to “clinical ethics support” AND “paediatrics” AND “structure/process/outcome”. Reference and citation list of included studies will be handsearched. A 10% random sample of retrieved titles/abstracts and all full texts will be independently dual-screened. We will conduct narrative and thematic synthesis for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively, following sequential explanatory synthesis guided by Donabedian’s framework of structure, process and outcomes. Quality will be assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (2018). The review will be reported using the adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence template. Stakeholders will be involved twice in the review process; prior to data extraction and synthesis and after preliminary results.Ethics and disseminationAs a systematic review of published data, no ethical approval is necessary. Results will be published in a relevant academic peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021280978.

Professional development in pediatric nursing: A study on the impact of educational module in legal and ethical care

“…13,14 Based on the information provided, it is clear that further examination is needed to determine the impact of the teaching module on enhancing legal and ethical procedures in paediatric nursing. 15 This research has the potential to greatly impact current education changes, potentially resulting in the broad implementation of similar programmes in healthcare systems both nationally and internationally. The results of this study could also provide guidance for policy-making in healthcare education, ensuring that training curricula adequately equip nurses to address the demands of their positions.…”