1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf02233628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of liver size and hepatic scintiscan

Abstract: of the thin lower edge of the liver. Thus, the fact that percussion might underestimate actual liver size is in no way a new observation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance of the liver edge below the costal margin correlates poorly with its actual size, and the location of the upper border of the liver as determined by percussion must be made at the same time. [1][2][3] This study compares different techniques for the estimation of liver size and explores some possible sources of error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance of the liver edge below the costal margin correlates poorly with its actual size, and the location of the upper border of the liver as determined by percussion must be made at the same time. [1][2][3] This study compares different techniques for the estimation of liver size and explores some possible sources of error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver span (height in the mid-clavicular line) measured during physical examination correlates well with liver height as determined in hepatic scintiscans or from direct measurement of the liver at autopsy. 3,4 The normal range of liver span measured by percussion and palpation has been reported for adults 3-' but not for children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The percentage of patients with liver spans measured by physical examination within 2 cm of the imaging study ranged from 38% to 78%. [1][2][3][4] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%