1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(83)80068-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of olfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
132
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimuli were presented to the subject in transparent polyethylene squeeze bottles with pop-up spouts that were inserted into the subjects' nostrils. A two-alternative, forced-choice, ascending method was used to assess olfactory threshold, 10 as modified by Murphy et al 11 The subject was presented with two bottles, one containing the odorant and the other a blank. The spout of the bottle was inserted into the nostril of interest.…”
Section: Disease-specific Symptoms and Olfactory Functional Outcome Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stimuli were presented to the subject in transparent polyethylene squeeze bottles with pop-up spouts that were inserted into the subjects' nostrils. A two-alternative, forced-choice, ascending method was used to assess olfactory threshold, 10 as modified by Murphy et al 11 The subject was presented with two bottles, one containing the odorant and the other a blank. The spout of the bottle was inserted into the nostril of interest.…”
Section: Disease-specific Symptoms and Olfactory Functional Outcome Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients reported significant reduction in severity of nasal obstruction (t [10] ϭ 4.20, P Ͻ .0009), nasal congestion (t [10] ϭ 5.67, P Ͻ .0001), and nasal discharge (t [9] ϭ 5.79, P Ͻ .0002) after ESS (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the mutual influences of the two chemical senses (see 13), nasal detection thresholds were measured in two groups of subjects: 1) a group with normal smell (normosmics) and 2) a group of previously diagnosed (see 14,15,16) When testing the anosmics, we found it necessary to prepare stimuli more concentrated than the mother solution. This held for all substances -except menthol, already at saturation -and additional steps were included until reaching the pure stimulus (100 %v/v).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was realistic to expect the threshold for the normosmics to fall below that of the anosmics and to reflect olfactory detection of these commonly employed odorants. This is so since anosmics are classified as such by their extremely impoverished olfactory ability -as measured by standard clinical tests, e.g., [13,15,16] -including measurements of nasal detection thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%