1989
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90037-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical evaluation of two monthly injectable contraceptives and their effects on some metabolic parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty subjects changed from Papanicolaou smear grade I, IIa, or IIb at baseline to grade IIIa (33) or grade IIIb-IV (7). 22 The authors concluded that these changes were not related to the vaginal ring but were detected because of more frequent screening.…”
Section: Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Forty subjects changed from Papanicolaou smear grade I, IIa, or IIb at baseline to grade IIIa (33) or grade IIIb-IV (7). 22 The authors concluded that these changes were not related to the vaginal ring but were detected because of more frequent screening.…”
Section: Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a trial involving 130 regularly menstruating women who were not lactating or pregnant, MPA-E 2 was compared with estradiol valerate 5 mg-norethisterone enanthate 50 mg (EV-NE; Mesigyna; Schering, Berlin, Germany), an injectable hormone contraceptive that is not available in the United States (65 women/group). 33 Efficacy, bleeding patterns, and adverse events were assessed. No pregnancies occurred throughout the 6-month trial; however, 23.1% of women treated with MPA-E 2 withdrew for reasons that included amenorrhea (45.5%), headache (18.2%), weight gain (18.2%), and prolonged bleeding plus backaches (9.1%).…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations