1992
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(92)90106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical experiences with keratinocyte grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(19). The introduction, during the past 20 years, of a variety of skin substitutes and of cultured keratinocytes has greatly improved the management of burned patients, especially those with extensive burns (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19). The introduction, during the past 20 years, of a variety of skin substitutes and of cultured keratinocytes has greatly improved the management of burned patients, especially those with extensive burns (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sites chosen for CEA application included the trunk, upper and lower limbs, and depended on pattern of burn injury and surgeon preference. CEA application over joints, bony prominences, and perisphincteric regions were difficult to immobilize and avoided . In most instances, weight bearing surfaces such as the back were avoided to minimize shear, pressure, and CEA dislodgement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of dressings, most common contact layers used were Vaseline® petrolatum gauze and tulle gras . Other non‐adherent contact layers used include Adaptic™, N‐terface®, Comfeel®, and UrgoTul® .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial motivation for the development of the CEA came from treating massive body surface area burns. 17 Since 1981, CEA also has been used for the coverage of wounds, such as large burn wounds, 18 burn scar excision, 19 leg ulcer, 20 donor sites of split-thickness skin, 21 and GCMN. 22 These clinical reports and our experience have shown that the CEA grafts take well on the dermal wound almost completely, with little scar formation, and shorten the healing period of the wounds compared with dermabrasion without CEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%