2014
DOI: 10.1177/2050313x14521158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical impact of laboratory error on therapeutic drug monitoring of once-daily tobramycin in cystic fibrosis: Case series

Abstract: Once-daily dosing intravenous tobramycin is commonly used to treat cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations. Clinicians often utilize historical therapeutic drug monitoring data to individualize the dose among patients who have been treated with tobramycin previously. This case series involves three patients with cystic fibrosis who had supra-therapeutic tobramycin levels despite use of a once-daily dosing that produced therapeutic drug levels during a previous hospital admission, raising questions about the va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19][20][21] Similarly, in stable patients, significantly discrepant concentrations from those expected either relative to previous estimates or predicted on the population pharmacokinetics should prompt careful consideration of a preanalytical source of error. 22 Although a more limited sampling approach resulted in less accurate pharmacokinetic parameter estimation relative to the reference, the effect was usually small (rRMSE ,15%). Although there is no established standard for acceptable accuracy in this context, it is of comparable magnitude to the accepted target ranges used in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21] Similarly, in stable patients, significantly discrepant concentrations from those expected either relative to previous estimates or predicted on the population pharmacokinetics should prompt careful consideration of a preanalytical source of error. 22 Although a more limited sampling approach resulted in less accurate pharmacokinetic parameter estimation relative to the reference, the effect was usually small (rRMSE ,15%). Although there is no established standard for acceptable accuracy in this context, it is of comparable magnitude to the accepted target ranges used in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in stable patients, significantly discrepant concentrations from those expected either relative to previous estimates or predicted on the population pharmacokinetics should prompt careful consideration of a pre-analytical source of error. (20)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%