2017
DOI: 10.1002/jum.14447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Impact of the Microembolic Signal Burden During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Just a Lot of Noise?

Abstract: In this multicenter study, we found no impact of the intraprocedural microembolic symbol/thromboembolic shower count on the occurrence of new DWI lesions, neuropsychological capability, or overt neurologic deficits after pulmonary vein isolation. Thus, not only the microembolic signal count but also procedural/individual factors may contribute to commensurable clinical damage, which may challenge this method as a valid biomarker during pulmonary vein isolation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible causes could be explained by the different number of MES in invasive procedures, heterogeneous methods used to analyze HITS, and by the fact that the studies differ as to the batteries of cognitive tests and testing batteries and time at which they were delivered. The impact of the intraprocedural MES counts on the occurrence of new MRI-DWI lesions, neuropsychological capability, or overt neurologic defi cits after pulmonary vein isolation was not demonstrated in a German multicentric study (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The possible causes could be explained by the different number of MES in invasive procedures, heterogeneous methods used to analyze HITS, and by the fact that the studies differ as to the batteries of cognitive tests and testing batteries and time at which they were delivered. The impact of the intraprocedural MES counts on the occurrence of new MRI-DWI lesions, neuropsychological capability, or overt neurologic defi cits after pulmonary vein isolation was not demonstrated in a German multicentric study (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study shows as well that the majority of the signals are gaseous signals [ 8 ]. Another multicentre study by a German research group confirms the mass occurrence of embolic, predominantly gaseous signals during atrial fibrillation ablation [ 9 ]. In the current work, the embolic signals were counted during the following prespecified procedural steps: transseptal puncture, catheter flushing, catheter exchange via transseptal sheath, angiography of the pulmonary veins, electroanatomical mapping, irrigated RF ablation and finally during admission of protamine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57,58 The clinical relevance of asymptomatic cerebral embolism detected on MRI and transcranial Doppler remains, however, unclear. 59,60 Despite technical improvements, the second-generation PVAC-Gold catheter still showed a high incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism (20 % versus none, p=0.011) and a higher amount and duration of microembolic signals compared with irrigated RFCA in a randomised clinical trial from our centre. 58…”
Section: Procedures Timementioning
confidence: 91%