Clinical Interviewing

Sommers‐Flanagan, John; Johnson, Veronica; Door, Maegan Rides At The

doi:10.1017/9781108235433.010

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A clinical interview most often serves as the primary source for gathering clinical impressions during an EBCPA. Much has already been written about the scientific bases of clinical interviews (e.g., Hurst & Beidel, 2018; Sommers-Flanagan et al, 2020) that will not be covered here in detail. Nevertheless, it is important for the assessing psychologist to be aware of issues surrounding reliability and validity, particularly in relation to structured versus unstructured interviews.…”

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA): Review of current state of the literature and best practices.

Wright¹,

Pade²,

Gottfried³

et al. 2022

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although it constitutes a primary function of psychologists, distinguishing the field from all others, and serves as a core competency in graduate training, there is not a great deal of literature (and certainly not consensus) on what constitutes evidence-based practice in clinical psychological assessment. The goal of this paper is to review the available literature (and clinical wisdom) related to the practice of evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA), aimed at improving outcomes in clinical settings. Within the framework of how EBCPA aspires to be and can be useful in clinical practice, this paper discusses specific components that contribute to best possible practices. Concrete recommendations are made, as well as calls

show abstract

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA): Review of current state of the literature and best practices.

Wright¹,

Pade²,

Gottfried³

et al. 2022

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessment of Internalizing Disorders

Naragon‐Gainey

McMahon

Park

2022

The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internalizing disorders, which include depression and anxiety as well as several other syndromes, are common and impairing conditions that form one of the spectra in structural models of psychopathology (i.e., the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology). This chapter reviews the hierarchical structure and contents of the Internalizing spectrum, as well as their key features and challenges that commonly arise when assessing these symptoms. Four types of assessment tools are presented—self-report measures, clinical interviews, ambulatory assessment, and performance-based clinician-rated measures (i.e., behavioral avoidance tasks)—along with their strengths and limitations, applications, and example measures as they relate to the Internalizing spectrum. The chapter also discusses considerations for assessment of internalizing symptoms in diverse populations and future directions in this area.

show abstract

Clinical Interviewing

Cited by 2 publications

References 30 publications

Evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA): Review of current state of the literature and best practices.

Evidence-based clinical psychological assessment (EBCPA): Review of current state of the literature and best practices.

Assessment of Internalizing Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About