2009
DOI: 10.1556/amicr.56.2009.1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical microbiology of early-onset and late-onset neonatal sepsis, particularly among preterm babies

Abstract: Prematurity has got special challenge for clinicians and also other medical staff, such as microbiologists. Immature host defense mechanisms support early-onset sepsis, which can be very serious with very high mortality. While the past decade has been marked by a significant decline in early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis in both term and preterm neonates, the overall incidence of early-onset sepsis has not decreased in many centers, and several studies have found an increase in sepsis due to gram-ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were isolated only in 4 cases (2.86%) causing LOS; two were born preterm, a known risk factor for candidemia [59]. Similar findings were found in other studies in Kenya (2.41%) [40] and India (2.63%) [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…were isolated only in 4 cases (2.86%) causing LOS; two were born preterm, a known risk factor for candidemia [59]. Similar findings were found in other studies in Kenya (2.41%) [40] and India (2.63%) [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…was isolated only in four patients who had late onset sepsis. Two of the patients were born preterm, a known risk factor for candidemia [13]. Prevalence of methicillin resistant S. aureus was noted to be low (10.2%) in this neonatal population compared to a similar study looking at bloodstream isolates in all age groups at AKUH-N where it was 21% (76/364) of S. aureus isolates [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…intestine, represents a hypothetical, but nevertheless attractive, approach for microbiota modulation in preterm infants. Despite the potential beneficial effects of such interventions on terms of microbiota composition, by reducing the levels of facultative anaerobes which include the most relevant nosocomial infectious agents for this infant population, 6,7 no attention has ever been paid to the effect of such interventions on intestinal microbiota in these infants. However, in addition to the potential benefits of such strategy there are also some potentially deleterious effects that should be carefully evaluated.…”
Section: Facultative and Strict Anaerobes In Preterm Neonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%