2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula‐free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo‐mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis

Abstract: The reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis with fibula-free flaps has been demonstrated to be a reliable technique with good long-term results. Implants placed in the reconstructed areas were demonstrated to integrate normally, with success and survival rates comparable to those obtained in case of implants placed in native bone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(67 reference statements)
8
186
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Two methods of management of this problem has been reported in literature. 27 This includes substitution of the skin around implants with mucosal grafts from the palate to obtain firmly attached, keratinized mucosa around implants, and the topical application of silver nitrate, particularly in patients who underwent maxillary resection, as this may lead to absence of palatal mucosa with no possibility of harvesting keratinized mucosa from this site. One limitation of the fibula free flap is that its average height is seldom more than 14 mm, which leads to a step at the graft-to-residual stump interface, this can be avoided by fixation of the upper border of the flap at the level of the residual alveolar ridge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods of management of this problem has been reported in literature. 27 This includes substitution of the skin around implants with mucosal grafts from the palate to obtain firmly attached, keratinized mucosa around implants, and the topical application of silver nitrate, particularly in patients who underwent maxillary resection, as this may lead to absence of palatal mucosa with no possibility of harvesting keratinized mucosa from this site. One limitation of the fibula free flap is that its average height is seldom more than 14 mm, which leads to a step at the graft-to-residual stump interface, this can be avoided by fixation of the upper border of the flap at the level of the residual alveolar ridge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone segmented can be transplanted with muscle and skin pad that allows simultaneous reconstruction of both hard and soft tissues, with considerable improvement of facial contour and oral functions such as speech and deglutition. Further, placing dental implants in the reconstructed areas helps to overcome problems related to the dental rehabilitation with removable prostheses [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used as osteomuscular flap or osteomyocutaneous flap, providing the possibility of simultaneous reconstruction of deficient soft tissues on the intra oral side (cheek mucosa, palate, floor of the mouth, etc.). Moreover, fibular bone presents favourable conditions for implant placement and subsequent implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation, due to its diameter and the good quality of its cortical bone [1,2]. Implants are now routinely used to re-establish dentistry section mastication in reconstructed mandible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibula exhibits reasonable resistance to peri-implant resorption [11]. The bone stock has adequate strength to withstand reasonable forces of mastication [10,11].…”
Section: Case -1mentioning
confidence: 99%