2018
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical outcome of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with femtosecond laser‐prepared grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 11 12 ] However, the comparability of FSL and MK-assisted donor lenticules in terms of surface smoothness, endothelial cell viability, and clinical outcomes is a matter of debate. [ 6 7 8 9 11 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[ 11 12 ] However, the comparability of FSL and MK-assisted donor lenticules in terms of surface smoothness, endothelial cell viability, and clinical outcomes is a matter of debate. [ 6 7 8 9 11 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…who reported poor graft adhesion with suboptimal visual acuity and quality with FSL-assisted donor lenticules. [ 8 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Бóльшая часть имеющихся публикаций на эту тему посвящена результатам задней послойной кератопластики с применением низкоэнергетических фемтолазерных систем [12][13][14]. Результаты при этом не всегда бывают сопоставимы с таковыми при ЗАПК [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified