Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of computer‐guided versus conventional implant‐retained hybrid prostheses: A long‐term retrospective analysis of treatment protocols

Abstract

Computer-guided implant placement for an implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is a valid, reliable alternative to the traditional approach for implant placement and immediate loading. Computer-guided implant placement showed higher implant survival rates and comparable long-term cost to non-guided implant placement.

Static computer‐aided, partially guided, and free‐handed implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

“…Nonetheless, the accuracy of implant placement only addresses one facet of sCAIP. Other relevant outcome measures are cost‐effectiveness (Joda, Derksen, Wittneben, & Kuehl, 2018; Ravida et al., 2018; Younes, Eghbali, De Bruyckere, Cleymaet, & Cosyn, 2019), patient's perception of treatment, impact on quality of life, and postoperative morbidity, which are variables that may determine the choice of implant placement modality in numerous clinical situations.…”

“…Nonetheless, the accuracy of implant placement only addresses one facet of sCAIP. Other relevant outcome measures are cost-effectiveness (Joda, Derksen, Wittneben, & Kuehl, 2018;Ravida et al, 2018;Younes, Eghbali, De Bruyckere, Cleymaet, & Cosyn, 2019…”

Comparison of three different types of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses: A long‐term retrospective study of clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness

“…Among these factors is determining whether to use a prosthodontic component composed of splinted versus non‐splinted crowns (Ravida, Barootchi et al, ). Splinted crowns tend to distribute the occlusal forces placed on the implants, resulting in a less frequent occurrence of prosthodontic complications and decreased strain on the surrounding peri‐implant bone (Clelland, Chaudhry, Rashid, & McGlumphy, ; Yilmaz, Seidt, McGlumphy, & Clelland, ).…”

“…Such a limitation can be overcome by using two implants supported by a bridge (de Souza Batista et al, ). Furthermore, an often‐overlooked influencing factor is the cost (Ravida, Barootchi et al, ). The use of two versus three implants could likely influence the clinical decision of therapy.…”

İmplant Destekli̇ Hi̇bri̇t Protezleri̇n Yapiminda Kullanilan Materyaller Ve Üreti̇m Yöntemleri̇

“…Bu komplikasyonlar arasında mukozitis ve peri-implantitis bulunmaktadır. Yapılan son çalışmalar incelendiğinde periimplantitis ve mukozitis görülme sıklığının yüksek olduğu bildirilmiştir 72,73 .…”