2019
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Stage I Medically Inoperable Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Abstract: Objectives: To utilize the RSSearch Patient Registry (RSSPR) to examine local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicities following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I (T1-T2/N0) medically inoperable small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Materials and Methods: We searched the RSSPR for medically inoperable stage I SCLC patients treated with definitive SBRT. Potential predictive factors of OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, SABR is not used in SCLC considering the rarity of early stage disease. Nevertheless, a multi-institutional registry study examined outcomes in 21 inoperable patients with SCLC treated to a median dose of 48 Gy in four fractions, with only four patients going on to systemic therapy [ 4 ]. Local control was not reported, but 1-year survival was 73% potentially a reflection of distant spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, SABR is not used in SCLC considering the rarity of early stage disease. Nevertheless, a multi-institutional registry study examined outcomes in 21 inoperable patients with SCLC treated to a median dose of 48 Gy in four fractions, with only four patients going on to systemic therapy [ 4 ]. Local control was not reported, but 1-year survival was 73% potentially a reflection of distant spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, nearly all studies on the subject of SABR in NSCLC have focused on more common histologies, such as squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Recent evidence has also suggested a potential role for SABR in treatment of early stage SCLC as well [ 4 ], however the efficacy and utilization patterns of SABR in LCNEC remains relatively unknown. Considering the paucity of evidence regarding SABR in LCNEC, we analyzed the national cancer database (NCDB) to examine trends in the use of SABR and compare outcomes in patients with LCNEC receiving SABR versus CFRT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raj et al. reported that for the patients with early-stage SCLC following SBRT, the 1-year and 2-year OS were 73.1% and 36.6%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates for the cohort were 100% ( 35 ). In the future, Radiomics model may provide an effective method to distinguish between NSCLC and SCLC clinically ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there were an increasing of evidences for radiation oncologists to choose SBRT as reasonable treatment for patients with early-stage SCLC (34). Raj et al reported that for the patients with early-stage SCLC following SBRT, the 1-year and 2-year OS were 73.1% and 36.6%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates for the cohort were 100% (35). In the future, Radiomics model may provide an effective method to distinguish between NSCLC and SCLC clinically (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2005[ 26 , 27 ], the first published experiences began to appear using single fraction radiation therapy in lung, in which doses of 30-34G achieved local response rates at one-year of 93%, with a G3 toxicity of 2%.…”
Section: Early-stage Peripheral Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%