2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes of VasoRing Connector in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Abstract: Use of VRC shortened operative time and improved bleeding control incorporating standard methods for aortic anastomoses during acute type A aortic dissection repair by total arch replacement and antegrade frozen elephant trunk procedure. Long-term follow-up and randomized comparison are needed to confirm VRC efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reviewing shreds of evidence, a total of 35 studies including 3211 patients were entered into the quantitative analysis (Figure 1). 11–44 The median size of reviewed reports was 72 patients (interquartile range 38 – 122). The majority of studies were performed in Chinese institutions, 19 studies including 2026 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing shreds of evidence, a total of 35 studies including 3211 patients were entered into the quantitative analysis (Figure 1). 11–44 The median size of reviewed reports was 72 patients (interquartile range 38 – 122). The majority of studies were performed in Chinese institutions, 19 studies including 2026 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 46 studies 5–48 consisting of 6313 patients included in this meta‐analysis (Figure 1). The patients’ mean age was 57.5 (95% CI: 55.1–55.9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 64 studies reporting outcomes of patients included in this report 13–76 . The proportions of studies from Asia, Europe, and North America were 54.7%, 31.3%, and 10.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%