2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-411546-0.00010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Pharmacology of Dopamine-Modulating Agents in Tourette’s Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
(363 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, solid evidence for their therapeutic benefit is often limited or not available. Although double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials found that haloperidol and pimozide were effective in reducing tic frequency and intensity, there are many reasons why these drugs should be avoided . For example, these and other typical neuroleptics carry the risk of adverse effects, such as metabolic syndrome, prolonged QT interval, and torsades de pointes.…”
Section: New Treatments and Discoveriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, solid evidence for their therapeutic benefit is often limited or not available. Although double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials found that haloperidol and pimozide were effective in reducing tic frequency and intensity, there are many reasons why these drugs should be avoided . For example, these and other typical neuroleptics carry the risk of adverse effects, such as metabolic syndrome, prolonged QT interval, and torsades de pointes.…”
Section: New Treatments and Discoveriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with this progress, the pharmacotherapy of tic disorders is still often based on the employment of antipsychotic agents (which block dopamine receptors). Indeed, haloperidol and pimozide remain the best-validated drugs to reduce tic severity and frequency in the majority of TS patients with medium and severe TS, but their use often results in poor therapeutic compliance, due to their potentially serious side effects (Silva et al, 1996; Mogwitz et al, 2013; Egolf and Coffey, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of pimozide and haloperidol in treating tics compared with placebo has been documented by 6 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of fair quality, respectively. [75][76][77] Direct comparison between the 2 agents did not show any significant difference in total tic scores, with a worse tolerability profile for haloperidol due to higher rates of sedation, lethargy, and, in particular, extrapyramidal symptoms. The use of fluphenazine is supported by open-label studies, 78 retrospective case series, 79 and one single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study 75 ; there is moderate evidence that fluphenazine has fewer adverse effects than haloperidol.…”
Section: Box 1 Secondary Causes Of Ticsmentioning
confidence: 91%