Clinical practice guidelines in the intensive care unit: a survey of Canadian clinicians’ attitudes

Abstract

Purpose: To understand clinicians' perceptions regarding practice guidelines in Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) to inform guideline development and implementation strategies. Methods:We developed a self-administered survey instrument and assessed its clinical sensibility and reliability. The survey was mailed to ICU physicians and nurses in Canada to determine local ICU guideline development and use, and to compare physicians' and nurses' attitudes and preferences towards guidelines. Results:The survey was completed by 51.6% (565/1095) of potential respondents. Although less than half reported a formal guideline development committee in their ICU, 81.0% reported that guidelines were developed at their institutions. Of clinicians who used guidelines in the ICU, 70.2% of nurses and 42.6% of physicians reported using them frequently or always. Professional society guidelines (with or without local modification) were reportedly used in most ICUs, but physicians were more confident than nurses of their validity (P < 0.001). Physicians considered endorsement of guidelines by a colleague more relevant for enhancing guideline use than did nurses (P < 0.001). Nurses considered low risk of the guideline and whether the guideline is consistent with their practice (P < 0.001) to be more relevant to guideline uptake than did physicians (P < 0.001). Lack of agreement with recommendations was a more important barrier to use of guidelines for physicians than for nurses (P < 0.001).Conclusions: Many Canadian institutions locally develop guidelines, and many ICU physicians and nurses report using them.Planning implementation strategies according to clinician preferences may increase guideline use. The nature of the differences in attitudes towards guidelines between nurses and physicians, and their impact on clinician adherence to guidelines requires further exploration.

Barriers to feeding critically ill patients: A multicenter survey of critical care nurses

“…As with any selfadministered survey, our results reflect the perceived importance of each barrier, which may not be synonymous with the actual impact of the barrier on providing EN to the patient. Although the overall response rate for the survey was only 41%, this is similar to other nursing surveys in critical care [20,21]. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of selection bias.…”

Intensive care nurses’ conceptions of a critical pathway in caring for aortic-surgery patients: A phenomenographic study

“…Hunter and Segrott (2008) state that exercising clinical judgment is essential for providing individualized care and in their literature review they raise concerns over the increasing use of CPs, which they claim can challenge nurses' clinical autonomy. However, the nurses in the present study, in accordance with other studies (Barker et al 1999;Sinuff et al 2007), did not conceive of the CP as a challenge to their clinical autonomy. They conceived both an obligation and a right to think independently and to use their clinical judgment in caring.…”

“…Other authors have highlighted that CP can support the implementation of national and local guidelines into clinical practice and help care professionals to keep in touch with the latest scientific evidence (Currie and Harvey, 2000;Ronellenfitsch et al 2008). In accordance with other studies (Barker et al 1999;Currie and Harvey, 2000;Furåker et al 2004;Sinuff et al 2007), the nurses conceived of the CP as a source of knowledge in caring. A CP implies that a care plan is visualized, which promotes continuity (Barker et al 1999;Currie and Harvey, 2000;Dahm and Wadensten, 2008) and benefits patients in the form of more security (Furåker et al 2004).…”

Critical Care Nurses' Pain Assessment and Management Practices: A Survey in Canada

“…Despite the publication of 3 guidelines pertinent to pain assessment and management of critically ill patients, ICU nurses, the clinicians most directly responsible for pain assessment and treatment, have not adopted the guidelines. In a previous Canadian survey 34 of clinicians' attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines, 65% of nurses and physicians used professional guidelines, and nurses, in particular, trusted guidelines endorsed by …”