2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical prediction models in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LDH is a cytoplasmatic enzymes highly expressed in the lung, liver, hearth, kidney and skeletal muscle, generally release in blood after cell death: thus, the lung damage, frequently founded in COVID-19 postmortem pathology [26] , could increase LDH blood levels [27] . The P/F, a parameters widely used to define the severity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [28] , has already been shown to be able to predict outcome in patients with COVID-19 [29] , [30] ; moreover, one study highlighted its inverse correlation with extension of the pulmonary inflammatory process on CT [31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDH is a cytoplasmatic enzymes highly expressed in the lung, liver, hearth, kidney and skeletal muscle, generally release in blood after cell death: thus, the lung damage, frequently founded in COVID-19 postmortem pathology [26] , could increase LDH blood levels [27] . The P/F, a parameters widely used to define the severity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [28] , has already been shown to be able to predict outcome in patients with COVID-19 [29] , [30] ; moreover, one study highlighted its inverse correlation with extension of the pulmonary inflammatory process on CT [31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al reported that the CURB-65 and the ISARIC-4C have the best discriminant performance in predicting in-hospital COVID-19 mortality when compared to other scores such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [ 41 ]. However, other comparative studies showed significantly lower performance of the CURB-65 score compared to the ISARIC 4C score [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 The reported AUROC values for APACHE II range between 0.745 and 0.825 for predicting fatal outcomes. 38,39 A SOFA score equal to or greater than 4 is related to MODS, 40 and the reported AUROC values for mortality using the SOFA score range between 0.679 and 0.814. 38,39 However, in our study focusing exclusively on patients with SARS-CoV-2, the AUROC values for APACHE II, SOFA, and 4C scores were lower than those reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 A SOFA score equal to or greater than 4 is related to MODS, 40 and the reported AUROC values for mortality using the SOFA score range between 0.679 and 0.814. 38,39 However, in our study focusing exclusively on patients with SARS-CoV-2, the AUROC values for APACHE II, SOFA, and 4C scores were lower than those reported in the literature. [11][12][13] It is important to note that these scoring systems evaluate a larger number of variables, which contributes to their higher predictive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%