2019
DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.jns172715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract: OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to derive a clinically applicable decision rule using clinical, radiological, and laboratory data to predict the development of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients. METHODS Patients presenting over a consecutive 9-year period with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and at least 1 angiographically evident aneurysm were included. Variables significantly associated with DCI in univariate analysis underwent multivariable logistic regr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
39
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
39
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There would be some potential biases and known and unknown confounders in this study. The patients with WFNS 4‐5 (23.1%) and mFS 3‐4 (63.3%) were consistent with other studies (WFNS: 22.4%‐31.1%; mFS: 56.2%‐77.7%). Additionally, all CT grades were evaluated by two blinded senior neurologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There would be some potential biases and known and unknown confounders in this study. The patients with WFNS 4‐5 (23.1%) and mFS 3‐4 (63.3%) were consistent with other studies (WFNS: 22.4%‐31.1%; mFS: 56.2%‐77.7%). Additionally, all CT grades were evaluated by two blinded senior neurologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study has tested the age by continuous variable and categorical variable in univariate analysis. However, consistent with a recent promoted DCI risk score, there was no statistical significance found in our study . The current studies on the prognostic value of age are controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations