2008
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2008.40.4.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Results of Chemotherapy based Treatment in Retinoblastoma Patients: A Single Center Experience

Abstract: Purpose: Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignancy in children. Since the 1990s, chemotherapy was indicated for intraocluar disease to reduce the frequency of enucleation and spare the complications associated with external beam radiation. In this study, we analyzed treatment results of retinoblastoma in our institute. Materials and Methods:Datas from children diagnosed with retinoblastoma and treated at Seoul National University Children's Hospital between 1986 and 2008 were analyzed retrospect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the irradiation era, 96% of bilaterally affected children had their worst eye enucleated at diagnosis, with primary enucleation of both eyes necessary in 3% and secondary enucleation of an only remaining eye due to treatment failure leading to total blindness in 25-29% (Abramson et al, 2004;Epstein et al, 2003). Despite the advent of systemic chemotherapy as first line treatment, 64-66% of children with bilateral disease still underwent primary enucleation of the more advanced eye and 2-6% required initial bilateral enucleation (Epstein et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2008), while advanced diseased eyes frequently needed external irradiation and/or secondary enucleation. The recent advances in targeted chemotherapy modalities allowed treatment of advanced disease and salvage of heavily pretreated eyes, resulting in a further decline of the primary enucleation rate to less than 8% and virtually no more bilateral ocular losses (Francis et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Treatment Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the irradiation era, 96% of bilaterally affected children had their worst eye enucleated at diagnosis, with primary enucleation of both eyes necessary in 3% and secondary enucleation of an only remaining eye due to treatment failure leading to total blindness in 25-29% (Abramson et al, 2004;Epstein et al, 2003). Despite the advent of systemic chemotherapy as first line treatment, 64-66% of children with bilateral disease still underwent primary enucleation of the more advanced eye and 2-6% required initial bilateral enucleation (Epstein et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2008), while advanced diseased eyes frequently needed external irradiation and/or secondary enucleation. The recent advances in targeted chemotherapy modalities allowed treatment of advanced disease and salvage of heavily pretreated eyes, resulting in a further decline of the primary enucleation rate to less than 8% and virtually no more bilateral ocular losses (Francis et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Treatment Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in our small series of patients with either bilateral or unilateral disseminated/refractory RB. Although the use of ifosfamide for treatment of RB is not standard of care, several reports support its use . The treatment was very well tolerated by all patients with no major side effects or unexpected toxicities; at the last follow‐up evaluation, none of them showed any relevant organ toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With these caveats, the expected toxicity of HDCT–AuSCT is definitely inferior to that induced by EBRT in a very young child, and also less mutilating than enucleation. Yet, the role of this treatment modality for intraocular disease must be timely revisited in the light of wider use of intra‐arterial administration of chemotherapy .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009), as well as from systemic multiagent chemotherapy, combined or not with other focal therapies (Gombos et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent adverse ocular events occurred in four of the patients reported herein, including ptosis, strabismus ⁄ exotropia and chorioretinal dystrophy with pigment alteration. However, complications may also result from other focal treatments including periocular carboplatin injection (Schmack et al 2006), diode laser hyperthermia (Gombos et al 2006), external beam radiotherapy (Abramson et al 2004;Payne et al 2009), as well as from systemic multiagent chemotherapy, combined or not with other focal therapies (Gombos et al 2007;Kim et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%