1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00573446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical results of rotational osteotomy for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head

Abstract: We reviewed the results of seven transtrochanteric rotational osteotomies done for painful avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The results tended to deteriorate over the time. Despite the overall unsatisfactory results at final follow-up, the procedure was valuable as it delayed the necessity for total hip arthroplasty. Six patients underwent total hip arthroplasty an average of 6.7 years following the osteotomy. The procedure is technically difficult and is associated with a high risk of late complication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rotational osteotomy is another viable option because it is a joint-preserving procedure and delays the need for a potential joint arthroplasty until a later age, similar to osteochondral allograft transplantation. However, a major disadvantage is its limited success in the treatment of conditions affecting the weightbearing surface of the femoral head in young patients, and the additional challenges of conversion to a THA [5,25,28]. Conversely, osteochondral allograft transplantation has the advantage of minimal deformity of the native anatomy and will not substantially complicate subsequent THA should the need arise, as has been described for similar conditions about the knee [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rotational osteotomy is another viable option because it is a joint-preserving procedure and delays the need for a potential joint arthroplasty until a later age, similar to osteochondral allograft transplantation. However, a major disadvantage is its limited success in the treatment of conditions affecting the weightbearing surface of the femoral head in young patients, and the additional challenges of conversion to a THA [5,25,28]. Conversely, osteochondral allograft transplantation has the advantage of minimal deformity of the native anatomy and will not substantially complicate subsequent THA should the need arise, as has been described for similar conditions about the knee [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible reasons for high incidences of failure of TRO in those reports may be related to technical difficulty or improper surgical techniques including preservation of nutrient vessels, varus position of the proximal femur after osteotomy, fixation stability, and improper postoperative management [3,8,9,31,44]. Sugioka et al [42] emphasized considerable care is required during osteotomy and rotation to preserve the vascular structure of the proximal femur, but in some reports which revealed high rates of failure, postoperative vascular status of the femoral head was not described [8,9,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dean and Cabanela [8] suggested early weightbearing after surgery, valgus position, and vascular compromise owing to a race-dependent difference in the anatomy of the hip capsule (ethnic origin) may have been factors in collapse of the femoral head after this procedure. Belal and Reichelt [3] considered TRO technically difficult and associated it with a high risk of late complications including progressive collapse, with failure of six of seven hips at a mean followup of 6.7 years. Rijnen et al [31] also stated the technique in Caucasian patients was more demanding for TRO owing to the different dimension of the hips and larger body size and weight of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is considered as being major surgery that may involve prolonged recovery and limited success in the treatment of defects at the weightbearing surface [21][22][23]. In addition, THA following femoral osteotomy is challenging due to the deformed geometry, and it may entail a higher complication rate due to the previously placed hardware and deformed anatomy [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%