2021
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical review of retinotopy

Abstract: Two observations made 29 years apart are the cornerstones of this review on the contributions of Dr Gordon T. Plant to understanding pathology affecting the optic nerve. The first observation laid the anatomical basis in 1990 for the interpretation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in 2009. Retinal OCT offers clinicians detailed in vivo structural imaging of individual retinal layers. This has led to novel observations which were impossible to make using ophthalmoscopy. The technique also helps to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study suggests that the mNTR is a novel OCT metric which may contribute to distinguishing chiasmal compression from atrophy due to POAG, as it is reduced in chiasmal compression but increased in POAG. This is based on the pattern of macular inner retinal layer atrophy, 5 and far superior to the global mGCIPL thicknesses which were not discriminatory. These data indicate that regional macular atrophy patterns can be easily quantified and convey important diagnostic clues that are obscured by overall retinal thickness measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This study suggests that the mNTR is a novel OCT metric which may contribute to distinguishing chiasmal compression from atrophy due to POAG, as it is reduced in chiasmal compression but increased in POAG. This is based on the pattern of macular inner retinal layer atrophy, 5 and far superior to the global mGCIPL thicknesses which were not discriminatory. These data indicate that regional macular atrophy patterns can be easily quantified and convey important diagnostic clues that are obscured by overall retinal thickness measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%