2015
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-15-0475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation – Insight Into the Mechanism –

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
30
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed that ERAFs were the sole significant factor for predicting AF recurrences after the blanking period, which was in agreement with the data post RF ablation . A prior study reported the greatest proportion of ERAFs in the first 2 weeks of the blanking period in a sample of patients fitted with an external loop recorder for the first 3 months after AF ablation using RF technology .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our study showed that ERAFs were the sole significant factor for predicting AF recurrences after the blanking period, which was in agreement with the data post RF ablation . A prior study reported the greatest proportion of ERAFs in the first 2 weeks of the blanking period in a sample of patients fitted with an external loop recorder for the first 3 months after AF ablation using RF technology .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…8, 16 We found, however, no significant difference in the incidence of PV foci (SSS group, 41.7% vs. non-SSS group, 40.7%, P=0.87) or LA-PV reconnection observed on second ablation (SSS group, 97.0% vs. non-SSS group, 94.7%, P=0.69) between the 2 groups. Thus, PV foci appear to have less impact on the discrepancy in recurrence rate between the 2 groups.…”
Section: Sss and Non-pv Vein Focimentioning
confidence: 54%
“…8- 10 In contrast, no factors that correlated with ERAF could be identified for CB ablation. The finding that the time-course of hs-CRP levels differed between the groups and that the inflammatory markers did not correlate with ERAF for CB ablation suggested that the mechanism of ERAF cannot be simply explained by inflammatory process alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Although our study population was small and the follow-up period was not long, ERAF correlated with late recurrences in both groups, which was in line with the prior studies. 3, 10 Although the exact mechanism of ERAF post-CB ablation is unknown, it is likely that the inflammatory response, PV reconnections, non-PV foci, and unknown factors are associated with ERAF after CB ablation. A more sensitive marker reflecting the inflammatory status might be required for further evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%