2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00310-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical thermometry, using the 27 MHz multi-electrode current-source interstitial hyperthermia system in brain tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, interstitial hyperthermia was combined with external radiotherapy only, in contrast with most other studies that combine interstitial hyperthermia with interstitial radiotherapy 10,11,14,22 . The advantage of the latter is that interstitial hyperthermia can be delivered through the brachytherapy catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, interstitial hyperthermia was combined with external radiotherapy only, in contrast with most other studies that combine interstitial hyperthermia with interstitial radiotherapy 10,11,14,22 . The advantage of the latter is that interstitial hyperthermia can be delivered through the brachytherapy catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The improved thermal dose uniformity by the MECS-IHT system has been demonstrated in a clinical brain tumour study 22 and was further optimized in a phase I study for prostate cancer 23 . The MECS-IHT system employs applicators for both thermometry and energy deposition.…”
Section: The Mecs Interstitial Hyperthermia Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are mainly effective for controlling the maximum temperature in the implanted volume. The minimum temperature in the implant can be estimated by successively switching off the heating applicators (Kaatee et al 2001). Ideally the full 3D temperature distribution is non-invasively measured online, for instance by MR thermometry (Nelson and Tung 1987, Samulski et al 1992, Wlodarczyk et al 1998, De Zwart 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal prescriptive parameters can be expressed in terms of the cumulative equivalent number of minutes of heating to 43°C or thermal dose, t 43 , where and the dimensionless constant, C, is 0.5 above 43°C and 0.25 below 43°C (13, 14). Implanted thermocouple devices (15, 16), microwave tomography (17, 18), ultrasound (19), chemical probes combined with MRI (20, 21), and T1‐weighted MRI (22, 23) have been investigated as guidance options for thermal ablation. Insufficient guidance of thermal ablation may result in the persistence of residual viable tumor, generally along the dorsal border of the prostate, adjacent to the rectum (24–26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%