2009
DOI: 10.1086/593121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Trial of Standing-Orders Strategies to Increase the Inpatient Influenza Vaccination Rate

Abstract: We compared strategies to increase the rate of influenza vaccination. A written standing-orders policy that enabled nurses to vaccinate patients was compared with augmentation of the standing-orders policy with either electronic opt-out orders for physicians or electronic reminders to nurses. Use of opt-out orders yielded the highest vaccination rate (12% of patients), followed by use of nursing reminders (6%); use of the standing-orders policy alone was ineffective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps this opt-in approach is less effective. 23,31 There were several limitations to our study. First, our baseline data collection required paper chart review, wherein there was no prompt to document VTE risk stratification (which is shown by the 3% documentation rate of VTE risk assessment).…”
Section: Potentially Preventable Vte Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Perhaps this opt-in approach is less effective. 23,31 There were several limitations to our study. First, our baseline data collection required paper chart review, wherein there was no prompt to document VTE risk stratification (which is shown by the 3% documentation rate of VTE risk assessment).…”
Section: Potentially Preventable Vte Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the 830 articles returned from the database searches and a further 4 articles from manual reference searching, we included 19 original research articles. Two articles reported on the same study 26 , 27 ; with a final number of 18 included studies. Overall, the studies evaluated the impact of 24 nudge interventions within the EHR on care delivery (see PRISMA Flow Diagram in Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies implemented multiple nudge interventions. 26 , 27 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 44 Twelve interventions aimed to improve medication or fluid use 26–28 , 35 , 40–44 ; 9 interventions to improve laboratory test ordering 29 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 ; 2 interventions to improve appropriate care 33 , 37 ; and 1 to improve imaging. 30 Overall, studies used 5 of the 9 nudge interventions listed in the taxonomy applied: (1) change choice defaults ( n = 9 interventions); (2) make information more visible ( n = 6 interventions); (3) change range or composition of options ( n = 5 interventions); (4) make information more or less salient ( n = 2 interventions); and (5) change option-related effort ( n = 2 interventions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies used computer-decision support models to increase vaccination compliance. In these models, standing orders have been shown to be the most effective 14. The ACIP has long encouraged standing orders to be used in inpatient settings 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%