2016
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000002633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Use of Deferoxamine in Distraction Osteogenesis of Irradiated Bone

Abstract: The deleterious effects of radiotherapy, including hypovascularity and hypocellularity, have made distraction of irradiated bones challenging. Animal studies, however, have demonstrated adjunctive measures such as the administration of deferoxamine to significantly improve bone regeneration across irradiated distraction gaps. In this report, we demonstrate, for the first time, enhanced bone formation following deferoxamine application in a patient following distraction of a previously irradiated maxilla. CT im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a collaboration between our laboratory, and reconstructive surgeons at Stanford University, the clinical repurposing, volumetric dosing and delivery of DFO to facilitate distraction osteogenesis in a young adult patient with maxillary hypoplasia secondary to previous radiotherapy was achieved. 42 The clinical utility of distraction osteogenesis in patients exposed to radiation is currently eschewed due to the prohibitive incidence of nonunions. Nonunion in this setting is thought to result from the paucity of vascular ingrowth provided by irradiated tissues and the unmet high angiogenic metabolic demands incurred by mechanical bone regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a collaboration between our laboratory, and reconstructive surgeons at Stanford University, the clinical repurposing, volumetric dosing and delivery of DFO to facilitate distraction osteogenesis in a young adult patient with maxillary hypoplasia secondary to previous radiotherapy was achieved. 42 The clinical utility of distraction osteogenesis in patients exposed to radiation is currently eschewed due to the prohibitive incidence of nonunions. Nonunion in this setting is thought to result from the paucity of vascular ingrowth provided by irradiated tissues and the unmet high angiogenic metabolic demands incurred by mechanical bone regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this study is with DFO dosage and treatment regimen. While these were selected based on previously published studies in other models (15, 17, 18, 31), whether a higher or lower dosage administered more or less frequently would result in increased or decreased vascularity is also unknown. Despite this, following DFO treatment, long-term retention of fat grafts injected into irradiated sites was significantly improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, advancements in mandibular reconstruction are highly translatable and have been successfully demonstrated by our laboratory through proof of concept in humans. 30 The advantages of non-vascularized bone graft transplantation are currently restricted to non-irradiated patient populations. In order to develop strategies to facilitate successful nonvascularized reconstruction in the setting of radiation, small-animal models that reflect clinical techniques in mandibular reconstruction are essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] Notably, translation of the surgical and pharmacologic strategies investigated by our laboratory has been successfully demonstrated in human mandibular reconstruction. 30 This study aims to expand upon surgical approaches currently researched by our laboratory as well as previous literature surrounding small-animal models of craniofacial reconstruction. Specifically, this investigation utilizes the 5mm critical-sized defect defined by Deconde et al 31 to establish a murine model of non-vascularized bone graft reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects using an iliac crest donor site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%