2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical utility and validation of two instruments (the Confusion Assessment Method Algorithm and the Chinese version of Nursing Delirium Screening Scale) to detect delirium in geriatric inpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For delirium to be defined, both the first and the second criteria have to be present, plus either: the third or the fourth criteria present, or both the third and forth criteria present together (Inouye et al, 1990). The CAM in the Chinese language has been proven to have good reliability and validity with use in the Chinese elderly population (Leung et al, 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For delirium to be defined, both the first and the second criteria have to be present, plus either: the third or the fourth criteria present, or both the third and forth criteria present together (Inouye et al, 1990). The CAM in the Chinese language has been proven to have good reliability and validity with use in the Chinese elderly population (Leung et al, 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM; Inouye et al, 1990), which has been translated into Chinese (Leung et al, 2008), is widely used to determine the prevalence of delirium. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) has been used to assess the severity of delirium based on 10 features (Breitbart et al, 1997; Marcantonio et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…그러나 이 도구는 전문 적인 훈련을 받은 사람만이 적용할 수 있으므로 (Gaudreau et al, 2005;Inouye et al, 2001;Lemiengre et al, 2006;Schuurmans et al, 2001) 의사나 훈련받은 전문가에 비해 섬망 증상에 대한 지식과 사정 능 력이 부족한 간호사들이 선별에 사용하기에는 어려움이 있을 수 있다 (Leung et al, 2008;Steis & Fick, 2008). 또한 CAM을 이용하여 환 자의 섬망 여부를 선별하려면 장기간의 면담 기법이 필요하기 때문 에 중환자실이 아닌 일반 병동 간호사들이 일상적인 간호 업무에서 수행하기에는 제한점이 있을 수 있다 (Gaudreau et al;Leung et al;Mccusker et al, 2011;Schreier, 2010) • 2단계-1개 노인 병동에 1개월 동안 입원한 노인 전수 중 대상자 선정기준에 적합한 42명 전수를 대상으로 예비조사를 실시하였다. …”
Section: 섬망을 사정하거나 진단할 수 있는 도구 중 현재까지 전 세계적 으로 가장 많이 활용되고 있는 도구는 Confunclassified
“…간호사들이 섬망 에 대한 이해 부족으로 적절한 선별 도구를 적용하지 못하면 입원 노인의 중요한 정신적 건강 문제인 섬망의 조기 발견 및 효율적 간 호가 불가능하다 (Gaudreau et al, 2005;Leung, Leung, Leung, & Pan, 2008;Schreier;Steis & Fick, 2008).…”
unclassified
“…The presence or absence of POD was defined according to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and the severity of POD was defined according to the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) (Inouye et al, 1990; Schuurmans et al, 2003). The Chinese version of the CAM and MDAS have been proved to have good reliability and validity with use in the Chinese elderly population (Leung et al, 2008; Shi et al, 2014). In this study, the highest CAM and MDAS scores from the postoperative day 1 and day 2 were presented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%