1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199911150-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Utility of Quantitative Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Determination for Predicting Cytomegalovirus Disease in Liver Transplant Recipients1

Abstract: The early detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after liver transplantation may fonn the basis of a pre-ernptive strategy for prevention of active CMV disease. We prospectively analyzed the clinical utility of weekly CMV plasma viral load determinations by quantitative PCR and the antigenemia assay in predicting CMV disease in 97 liver transplant recipients. CMV disease occurred in 21/97 (21.7%) patients a mean of 60 days post-transplant. Using a threshold of >400 copieslml plasma, PCR had a sensitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
133
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
133
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMV antigenemia test is widely used for diagnosis of disease in various immunosuppressed populations [52][53][54] and has largely replaced the standard viral culture and shell vial assays due to its increased sensitivity and predictive value. Several studies have found that CMV PCR compares favorable with CMV antigenemia in terms of both concordance and quantification 42,47,[55][56][57][58] (X Bai, RH Scheuermann, J Luby, K St. George, and C Rinaldo, unpublished findings). In some studies, PCR appeared to provide for earlier anticipation of disease 41,57 and was superior for predicting recurrent disease.…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Quantitative Pcrmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CMV antigenemia test is widely used for diagnosis of disease in various immunosuppressed populations [52][53][54] and has largely replaced the standard viral culture and shell vial assays due to its increased sensitivity and predictive value. Several studies have found that CMV PCR compares favorable with CMV antigenemia in terms of both concordance and quantification 42,47,[55][56][57][58] (X Bai, RH Scheuermann, J Luby, K St. George, and C Rinaldo, unpublished findings). In some studies, PCR appeared to provide for earlier anticipation of disease 41,57 and was superior for predicting recurrent disease.…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Quantitative Pcrmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar conclusions have been drawn from recent studies involving other immunosuppressed cohorts. 38,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Quantitative PCR for CMV appears to be an effective diagnostic tool in identifying patients with disease. In addition, PCR detection of DNA targets is less sensitive to sample handling than other diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Predictive Value Of Quantitative Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMV QNAT is the main alternative option to antigenemia (63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69). The testing requires expensive equipment and specialized expertise.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, high CMV viral loads correlate with risk of developed CMV disease. 9 However, the correlation between viral load and immunohistopathology is not well documented. 10 Our patient was not treated for CMV infection because CMV viral load was repeatedly negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%